163
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Mapping the FACT-G to EQ-5D-3L utility index in cancer with the Chinese values set

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 1103-1116 | Received 03 Dec 2021, Accepted 15 Jun 2022, Published online: 21 Jun 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Objective

The purpose of this research was to create a function for mapping the cancer-specific instrument (FACT-G) to a preference-based measure (EQ-5D-3 L) utility index for health-related quality of life, with utility scores generated using the Chinese value set.

Method

A cross-sectional study among 243 Chinese patients with cancer was conducted through EQ-5D-3 L and FACT-G questionnaires survey. The EQ-5D-3 L utility index values were predicted based on OLS, GLM, CLAD, and Tobit model regression approaches. The performance and predictive power of each model were also evaluated using r2 and adj- r2, MAE, RMSE, ICC, and MID. Linear equating was used to avoid regression of the OLS model to mean. The model was validated using a 10-fold cross-validation method.

Results

Among all regression models for the FACT-G, the OLS 5 model predicted mean EQ-5D-3 L values the best, in terms of model goodness of fit (r2 = 0.6230, MAE = 0.0448, RMSE = 0.0624). The OLS model proved to be the most accurate for the mean, and the linear equating scores were much closer to the observed scores.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the best algorithm for FACT-G mapping to EQ-5D-3 L utility index is OLS model, based on the survey of Chinese patients with cancer.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank all the members of the Cancer Screening Program in Urban China from the National Cancer Center of China, provinces, and external expert panels. We are also grateful to the participants for this study. This report was funded by the National Key Public Health Program of China (Cancer Screening Program in Urban China). The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Approval No. 15-071/998). All participants gave their [written] informed consent.

Author contributions

L Yang is in charge of the project. Z He drafted the manuscript. W Liang, W Xu, and W Huang conducted the data collection. L Yang, X Wang, and K Huang provided critical comments in revising the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2022.2091546

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Public Health Program of China (Cancer Screening Program in Urban China).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.