Abstract
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN IN THIS AREA
• | ‘Uncertainty’ is inevitable in medical practice and has been linked to doctors' experiences of ambiguity. | ||||
• | Approaches to uncertainty include ‘toleration’ and ‘control’, while uncertainty has also been seen as ‘relational’, arising between doctors and their patients together. | ||||
• | Various taxonomies have been proposed including dimensions of scientific knowledge, service design and patients own concerns. |
WHAT THIS WORK ADDS
• | Discussions among associates in training (AiT) revealed narratives of uncertainty which included reflection and interpretation. | ||||
• | AiTs found some ‘functional ways through’ uncertainty, however, uncertainty also resulted in ‘dysfunctional ways out’. | ||||
• | A pragmatic classification of uncertainty in general practice emerged, comprising analysing, negotiating, networking and team-working uncertainties, which facilitates identification of the skills AiTs need to develop. |
SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK
• | Can this pragmatic classification of uncertainty result in educational interventions to help AiTs to manage uncertainty more effectively? | ||||
• | What techniques will help AiTs to learn to manage the emotional burden of uncertainty and maintain resilience? | ||||
• | Could this classification of uncertainty help doctors in other specialities? |