Abstract
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN IN THIS AREA
• | There is a small existing literature on the GP retainer scheme. | ||||
• | Some of the published studies have been rendered out of date by changes which have been made to the scheme since its inception in 1972. | ||||
• | Existing studies are supportive of the scheme whilst finding inconsistencies in provision of training and limitations due to the restriction to five years. | ||||
• | Previous studies rely on data from a single deanery (Webb,1,2 Muller,3 Hastie,4 Woodwark et al,5 Taylor,6 Smith et al7) or two neighbouring deaneries (O'Kelly8). |
WHAT THIS WORK ADDS
• | This unique national survey of the views and experiences of GP retainers is of particular interest to policy makers and clinical educators. | ||||
• | The current context of organisational change and new working patterns, together with the high cost of medical training, have increased the importance to the NHS of retaining its trained workforce. | ||||
• | The study shows the value of the retainer scheme in ensuring GPs retain and build skills and are not lost to the workforce, and points to limitations in implementation. |
SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE WORK
• | Research following subsequent career pathways over an extended period and research capturing the perspectives of practices employing GP retainers are both recommended. |