113
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Evaluation and Innovations

Candidate feedback on the Induction and Refresher (I&R) scheme-simulated surgery

, , &
Pages 237-242 | Received 31 Oct 2018, Accepted 20 May 2019, Published online: 17 Jul 2019
 

ABSTRACT

The simulated surgery examination is one of the tripos of entry assessments for the Induction and Refresher (I&R) Scheme. It is used to assess the clinical and consulting skills of GPs prior to a period of supervised practice. The assessment involves observing candidates consulting with simulated patients played by role-players presenting standardised cases. Additionally, this assessment provides an ‘educational prescription’ for both passing and failing candidates as well as evidence of linguistic competency for overseas candidates.

A feedback questionnaire is administered to candidates immediately after the examination, to seek their views and to evaluate their experience of the exam. Between July 2015 and July 2018, 401 candidates completed the examination and questionnaire. Quantitative and qualitative data has been collected and analysed with the findings reported in this paper. Overall candidates are satisfied with the examination, and regard it as a valid assessment of their GP consulting skills. However, there are still concerns regarding the I&R application process although there is evidence that there has been a trajectory of improvement over the past three years. Candidate feedback obtained has been used in an iterative manner to ensure quality control of the examination as well as for prompting improvements in the process.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Richard Weaver for his advice and leadership.

Ethical approval

The authors confirm that this study had candidates’ consent as part of the ongoing quality assurance of the Simulated Surgery Examination and therefore does not require separate ethical approval.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

No funding was required for this evaluation.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.