146
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Evaluation and Innovations

Do fellowships for newly qualified GPs improve retention? Evaluation of London’s SPIN New to Practice Fellowships

Pages 342-346 | Received 06 Apr 2022, Accepted 29 Aug 2022, Published online: 28 Sep 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Background

We explored whether having a variety of work roles and extra support during the first 2 years after qualifying would retain general practitioners (GPs) in London. Newly qualified GPs were offered a Fellowship comprising permanent salaried positions, part-time (portfolio) roles outside general practice and peer support for 1–2 years.

Methods

We surveyed newly qualified GPs taking part in the Fellowship near the beginning of their Fellowship (91) and again after 8–10 months (93). We interviewed 34 newly qualified GPs taking part in the Fellowship and 20 who were not. We surveyed and interviewed representatives from employing practices (171), organisations hosting portfolio roles (20), those facilitating the Fellowship (10) and other stakeholders (43).

Findings

Over a 2.5-year period, employers recruited and retained 425 newly qualified GPs to salaried posts using the Fellowship. Eighty-eight per cent of the newly qualified GPs taking part said they intended to stay working in local practices. They said that undertaking a portfolio role helped them feel valued, had more variety and integration with the wider professional community. Those with two or more portfolio sessions per week were the most positive.

Conclusions

Portfolio roles and peer support may increase newly qualified GPs intention to stay working in salaried posts, however it is too early to say whether these intentions will translate into behaviour.

What this evaluation adds to current knowledge

Portfolio roles and monthly peer support helped newly qualified GPs feel supported and valued, which may influence their intention to stay working in general practice locally.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The evidence centre were commissioned by HEE London for external evaluation of the programme.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.