307
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Meta-analysis

Global prevalence of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines and associated factors in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 843-851 | Received 17 Oct 2021, Accepted 11 Mar 2022, Published online: 22 Mar 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant women and its determinants.

Method

We searched the bibliographic databases (Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science) for the relevant studies from 1 January 2020 to 11 July 2021. We pooled the prevalence of vaccine acceptance among pregnant women using a random-effects model and conducted subgroup analyses to explore its determinants. The result was expressed as a pooled prevalence percentage and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% CIs.

Results

    We found ten studies that were suitable, with 16, 696 participants from 32 countries. COVID-19 vaccination acceptability in pregnant women was 54 percent globally (95% CI: 45, 62; I2= 99.05). There was no association between sociodemographic factors including age >35 years (aOR: 1.17, 95%CI: 0.95, 1.43), high education (aOR: 1.03, 95%CI: 0.79, 1.35), income levels (aOR: 1.18, 95%CI: 0.80, 1.75), knowledge scores (aOR: 2.55, 95% CI: 0.78, 8.34) and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.

Conclusion

About half of pregnant women accepted the COVID-19 vaccine. We did not find any association between sociodemographic factors and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. However, these findings should be considered with caution due to small number of studies and the substantial heterogeneity between them.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.