215
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

High power Q-switched 1064 nm / 532 nm Nd:YAG Laser in tattoo removal: A systematic review

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 41-48 | Received 13 Jul 2020, Accepted 28 Sep 2021, Published online: 20 Oct 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Q-switched 1064 nm/532 nm Nd: YAG Lasers present important characteristics which can contribute toward the removal of tattoos, for having the ability to reach only specific targets with minimal damage to the tissue. Despite reports of their clinical benefits, only a few scientific studies demonstrate the efficacy and safety of these types of lasers in the short and long term. To substantiate the effects, benefits, and safety of the application of Q-switched 1064 nm/532 nm Nd: YAG lasers, a systematic review was carried out from September to December of 2019, about the studies which report their use in the removal of tattoos, published in the last 20 years. Randomized clinical trials in humans were considered, as long as they evaluated the efficacy, safety, and benefits of the application of Q-switched 1064 nm/532 nm Nd: YAG lasers in the removal of black and color tattoos in different skin phototypes. One hundred and twenty-two articles were identified after the titles, abstracts were read, and duplicates were removed; six articles were left, which were included in the research (188 individuals). The Q-switched 1064 nm/532 nm Nd: YAG lasers seem promising in the short term, with minimal adverse effects; however, the efficacy and safety in the long term still present limitations. Consequently, future research is necessary, with better methodological standardization applied and with a follow-up for a longer period of evaluation of possible permanent adverse effects, to determine the standardization and safety of the therapy with the lasers Nd: YAG de 1064 nm/532 nm Q-switched.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Role of funding source

The authors declare no research funding was provided by any company.

Ethical approval

the research was not submitted to an ethics committee, as it was a review study.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.