Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes at 24 months postmenstrual age of two populations receiving beractant replacement therapy using less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) versus intubation, administration of surfactant, and early extubation (INSURE). Hospital admission requirements, psychomotor development, and respiratory and neurological outcomes were studied.
Study design
This was a single-center, retrospective, and descriptive study with a sample of 60 patients (30 for each group) on nasal continuous positive airway pressure during the first 3 days of life, requiring surfactant administration.
Results
We found no significant differences between both groups on psychomotor development and respiratory and neurological outcomes.
Conclusion
Compared to INSURE technique, the administration of surfactant by LISA is feasible and safe and reduces invasive mechanical ventilation exposure with no differences in the follow-up neurodevelopmental and respiratory outcomes at 24 postmenstrual age.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Complutense University of Madrid for support in research projects. To Marisol Martínez-Tristani for helping to edit the manuscript.
Disclosure statement
MSL has acted as an expert advisor and speaker for AbbVie and has received honoraria in this regard. No potential other conflict of interest was reported by the authors.