346
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus following assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis of 59 cohort studies

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 2731-2740 | Received 01 May 2018, Accepted 18 Sep 2019, Published online: 01 Oct 2019
 

Abstract

Objective

The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been associated with an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in previous studies, but its risk has not been consistent. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the risk of GDM in women who conceived with ART via a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Methods

ISI Web of Knowledge, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched to identify studies that evaluated the risk of GDM through May 2017 using the relevant keywords. Two reviewers independently performed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model.

Results

The search yielded 957 records relating to GDM and use of ART, from which 59 eligible cohorts were selected for meta-analysis (n = 96,785). There was evidence of substantial heterogeneity among these studies (χ(58)2 = 3072.34, p < .001; I2=98.1%). The pooled estimate of GDM risk using the random effects model was 9.00% (95% CI: 7.90–10.20). Visual inspection of the funnel plot indicated the presence of low publication bias, but Egger’s test did not reveal publication bias.

Conclusions

The findings revealed that the risk of GDM was very high among women who conceived with ART treatment. GDM screening, management, and improved care are vital in ART pregnancy.

Author contributions

SM, BN, PA, ROS and AAH conceived the study design. SM, MM, PA, BN, EKM and AA collected the data. AAH analyzed the data. All authors contributed equally to writing the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.