100
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Local cerebroplacental ratio reference ranges are better predictors for adverse delivery outcomes in normal weight fetuses during pregnancy

, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 3475-3480 | Received 24 Jul 2019, Accepted 24 Oct 2019, Published online: 25 Nov 2019
 

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the predictive value of local versus external cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) reference ranges for delivery outcomes in low-risk pregnancies.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all feto-maternal demographic and biometric data in fetuses with normal estimated fetal weight (EFW) and a CPR examination between the years 2014–2019, in a university medical center. The study group included healthy singleton pregnancies from 32-week gestation, with an examination-to-delivery interval of <31 days. The three models compared two thresholds: <5th percentile (CPR 1, CPR 3) and <10th percentile (CPR2). The CPR1 and CPR2 models both use local CPR reference ranges, while the CPR3 model uses an external CPR reference range. The main outcome was predictive accuracy for urgent cesarean delivery (CD), operative delivery (OD), and composite outcome (CO), defined as an Apgar score of <7, fetal blood pH < 7.1 or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Results

Overall, 410 low-risk pregnancies with normal weight fetuses were enrolled in the study. All three CPR models turned out to be significant predictors of CD, with an odds ratio (OR) of 9, 95% CI (2.7–27), p < .001 for CPR1, and an OR of 2.9, 95% CI (1.1–7.4), p < .04 for CPR2, and an OR of 3.4, 95% CI (1.7–6.8), p < .001 for CPR3. All the three models were also found to be predictors of OD, and an OR of 6.9, 95% CI (2.1–22) p < .04 for CPR1, and an OR of 2.8, 95% CI (1.2–6.7), p < .04 for CPR2, and an OR of 2.8, 95% CI (1.4–5.3) p < .01 for CPR3. The positive predictive values (PPV) for CD and OD were both 50% for CPR1, versus 28% and 26% in CPR2, and 24% and 25% in CPR3. The negative predictive value (NPV) was similar, around 88% in all three models. None of the models were found to be significant predictors for CO.

Conclusions

A CPR model based on local reference ranges and <5th percentile cutoffs showed the highest PPV for CD and OD. The calculation of local references for CPR should be encouraged.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by our institutional review board.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff at BUMCA US unit for their support and collaboration.

Author contributions

Ef. Zohav: Protocol development, Critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content

Ey Zohav: Data analysis, Statistic analysis

M. Rabinovich: Data collection and management, Statistical analysis

Y. Ovadia: Protocol development, Data collection and management, Manuscript writing and editing

S. Shenhav: Data validation, Manuscript writing and editing.

EY Anteby: Study conception, Data analysis, Critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content

L. Grin: Study conception and design, Data analysis, Manuscript writing

All authors approved the final version to be published.

Disclosure statement

The authors of this study declare no conflicts of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.