Practice patterns of obstetric care in twin gestations: the value of MFM consultation

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the practice patterns among Lebanese obstetricians regarding obstetric care of twins and to compare selected practice patterns between general obstetricians and maternal fetal medicine physicians.

Methods

Questionnaires distributed during the annual meeting of the Lebanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Results

Questionnaires were returned by 69.2% of the 296 physicians approached. Ten percent had fellowship training in Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM). Thirty-nine percent perform cervical length measurement at 20–24 weeks of gestation and 34% recommend vaginal progesterone in case of a short cervix. When comparing selected practice patterns between MFM & general obstetricians, MFM specialists were less likely to perform cervical cerclage in the first trimester (5.9% versus 49%, p = .001), more likely to offer prenatal screening for aneuploidy (66.6% vs 46.4%, p = .03), less likely to use vaginal progesterone in the second trimester in the case of a short cervix (42.1% vs 61.8%, p = .04), less likely to perform serial ultrasound exam in the third trimester to assess fetal growth (50% vs 78%, p = .005) and more likely to deliver monoamniotic twins at 32–34 weeks of gestation (55% vs 37%, p = .05).

Conclusion

Because of the different background of the Lebanese physicians, MFM specialists are more likely to follow obstetric care guidelines in twin gestation.

Keywords:

• Twin gestation
• perinatal care
• obstetricians
• maternal fetal medicine

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).