Abstract
Ecological niche modelling is useful in estimating the environmental requirements of species and, by extension, can also estimate their distributional areas. For most cacti, ecological niche modelling and comparisons between species have only been performed for a set of variables mainly associated with temperature and precipitation. To expand environmental predictors in addition to climate variables, we use topographic and edaphic variables. The aims of this study were to determine which environmental factors influence the geographical distribution of the P. leucocephalus species group s.s. from Mexico and Central America, to build species distribution models, and to assess whether species have different climatic preferences. Based on ecological niche modelling, the main environmental variables that contribute to the distribution of species and the similarities or differences in ecological niches between species were inferred using Maxent and ENMTools. The results revealed that the studied species had different responses to environmental variables, resulting in a unique combination of conditions for each species, showing only six environmental variables in common. In general, variables with the greatest contributions to the models were climatic, followed by edaphic and topographic variables. The results of the quantification of niches between species showed that there was less than 0.5 overlap in Schoener’s D values, suggesting niche divergence for the group species but in environments more similar than would be expected by random chance. Although species shared affinities for seasonally dry tropical forests, the importance of preferences for different sets of environmental variables by each species was clear. In addition, niche divergence between closely related species of the P. leucocephalus group s.s. is concordant with the previous delimitation at the species level.
Acknowledgements
This article constitutes part of the doctoral research of Daniel Franco Estrada, who thanks the graduate program Doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas, UNAM and acknowledges the scholarships provided by CONACyT. We thank the staff from the herbaria CIDIIR, ENCB, FCME, HCIAD, IBUG, IZTA, MEXU, OAX, UAMIZ, and UAT, particularly to M. R. García Peña (MEXU) for their support in requesting and obtaining images from several herbarium specimens. We also thank Alice Calvente for their valuable comments on the preliminary version and two anonymous reviewers for their relevant suggestions that allowed us to improve this contribution.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Supplemental material
Supplemental material for this article can be accessed here: https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2022.2128928.
Associate Editor: Dr Nadia Bystriakova