459
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: current and future perspectives

, , , &
Pages 181-189 | Received 02 Dec 2016, Accepted 14 Feb 2017, Published online: 25 Feb 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Vasodilator and dobutamine are the main pharmacological agents used in current stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Exercise stress has well-established advantages and it is commonly used in other stress imaging, but the technical considerations have limited its use in stress CMR. In this review, we will describe the diagnostic performance, prognostic value, strengths and challenges of current stress CMR techniques. We will also discuss future perspectives of exercise stress CMR.

Areas covered: Despite notable mechanistic differences, vasodilator and dobutamine stress CMR offer similar diagnostic and prognostic value in coronary artery disease. Combined perfusion and wall motion assessment has been explored with dobutamine stress CMR: diagnostic sensitivity improved at the expense of reduced specificity. However, a combined assessment may provide additional prognostic value in selected patients. There is emerging interest and promising data in exercise stress CMR because of the availability of CMR-compatible stress equipment and development of novel real-time sequences that allow imaging during exercise with adequate spatiotemporal resolution.

Expert commentary: Exercise stress CMR is able to assess wall motion abnormalities, perfusion defects, exercise capacity and viability in a single examination. This holds important clinical potential in a variety of cardiovascular conditions.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was funded by the National Medical Research Council, Singapore.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.