Abstract
As a result of developments in assisted reproductive technology (ART), it is now possible to choose the sex of a baby. However, the procedures are currently not allowed for this purpose in Australia. This article explores how the positions for and against the use of ART for social sex selection are constructed by parents and parents-to-be in online discussion forums. Critical Discourse Analysis is employed to identify the arguments, evidence and experience drawn upon in the negotiation of the topic. We identify an important distinction between the legitimacy of using ART procedures for social sex selection, and the appropriateness of individuals actually wanting to use the procedures. We further show that expectations about the parent/child relationship, the nature of parental love and implications for society are mobilized in the debate, much of which is underscored by traditional gender constructions.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Olivia Monson
Olivia Monson is a PhD student in psychology at Murdoch University in Western Australia working under the supervision of Associate Professor Ngaire Donaghue and Professor Rosalind Gill. Her research is informed by qualitative methodology with a focus on critical health psychology, specifically obesity and weight loss discourse. The current article is based on her honours thesis.
Ngaire Donaghue
Ngaire Donaghue is an Associate Professor in the Social and Political Psychology Research Group at Murdoch University in Western Australia. Her research centres on ideological aspects of gender and subjectivity, with a particular focus on critical feminist understandings of body dissatisfaction and beauty practices.