1,211
Views
135
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Core structure of screw dislocations in body-centred cubic metals: relation to symmetry and interatomic bonding

Pages 415-428 | Received 11 Jan 2003, Accepted 18 Jun 2003, Published online: 21 Feb 2007
 

Abstract

In this paper we discuss both the crystallographic aspects that govern the general features of the cores of ⟨111⟩ screw dislocations in bcc metals and the role of interatomic bonding that is specific to given materials. This analysis is carried out by comparing the results of two atomistic calculations of dislocations in molybdenum, one performed using many-body central force potentials and the other bond-order potentials that include the angular dependence of interatomic interactions. In both cases the core spreads into three {110} planes of the [111] zone but in one case it is unique and invariant with respect to the ⟨101⟩ type diad, a symmetry operation of the bcc lattice, and in the second case two distinct configurations exist that are related by the diad operation. Which of the structures is found depends on interatomic interactions and it is shown that the γ surface for {110} planes can be used to predict the type of the core spreading. We then demonstrate that both core structures may lead to very similar responses of the dislocation to applied stresses since the strained crystal loses the original symmetry, in particular the corresponding ⟨101⟩ type diad, and thus the distinction between the two types of core vanishes. Finally, we discuss the generality of these concepts when analysing dislocation cores in materials with other structures than bcc.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the US Department of Energy (BES grant DE-FG02-98ER45702) and by the National Science Foundation (grant DMR02-19243).

Notes

†Email: [email protected]

†In the [111] projection, which is used when depicting the core, the former structure appears as sixfold and the latter as threefold.

†The values given by Ito and Vitek (Citation2001) are twice as high owing to an unfortunate error that introduced a factor of two into the evaluation of the CRSS.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.