88
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Electrochemical fatigue sensor response to Ti–6 wt% Al–4 wt% V and 4130 steel

, , , , &
Pages 331-349 | Received 27 Jan 2003, Accepted 13 May 2003, Published online: 21 Feb 2007
 

Abstract

Some of the finer details concerning electrochemical–mechanical interactions under cyclic stressing, observed by the electrochemical fatigue sensor (EFS), are reported, with emphasis on a series of ramp-and-hold cyclic tests on samples of hardened Ti–6 wt% Al–4 wt% V and 4130 steel. These tests were designed to further our understanding of the mechanisms underlying EFS response by revealing its timing and morphology, as well as any dependence on stress range, strain rate or mean stress. The EFS is an instrument that monitors an electrochemical current (‘the EFS current’) as a means of investigating fatigue damage in metals; specimens are fatigued in a benign electrolyte, under controlled conditions, so that their fatigue lives do not differ from those obtained in air. The results show that cyclic loading produces a cyclic EFS current with extrema located at points in the loading cycle where the strain rate is highest. Localized fatigue straining and crack-associated plasticity enhance the EFS current, producing peaks that reveal information about the timing and magnitude of plastic response on a cycle-to-cycle basis. The response depends on the cyclic variables studied in a manner that is convenient for experimentation. The EFS current reflects the superposition of two basic components: one is correlated with elastic strain and is becoming better understood; the other is directly related to plasticity.

Acknowledgements

We warmly thank the US Air Force and our scientific and commercial collaborators (SwRI, Matech Inc. Optim Inc. and SIMS) for their support, cooperation and stimulation. One of us (A.W.) gratefully acknowledges the award of a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, as well as the support of the University of Pennsylvania during the preparation of this manuscript.

Notes

§Present address: Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Email: [email protected]

‡Email: [email protected]

‡Email: [email protected]

‖Present address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA. Email: [email protected]

††Email: [email protected]

Additional information

Notes on contributors

C. Laird Footnote††

§Present address: Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Email: [email protected] ‡Email: [email protected] ‖Present address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA. Email: [email protected] ¶Email: [email protected] ††Email: [email protected]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.