688
Views
58
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Part A: Materials Science

A phase field model for the formation and evolution of martensitic laminate microstructure at finite strains

&
Pages 4250-4290 | Received 31 Jan 2012, Accepted 18 Jun 2012, Published online: 30 Jul 2012
 

Abstract

The extraordinary properties of shape-memory alloys stem from the formation and evolution of their complex microstructure. At lower temperatures, this microstructure typically consists of martensitic laminates with coherent twin boundaries. We suggest a variational-based phase field model at finite strains for the formation and dissipative evolution of such two-variant martensitic twinned laminate microstructures. The starting point is a geometric discussion of the link between sharp interface topologies and their regularisation, which is connected to the notion of Γ-convergence. To model the energy storage in the two-phase laminates, we propose an interface energy that is coherence-dependent and a bulk energy that vanishes in the interface region, thus allowing for a clear separation of the two contributions. The dissipation related to phase transformation is modelled by use of a dissipation potential that leads to a Ginzburg–Landau type evolution equation for the phase field. We construct distinct rate-type continuous and finite-step-sized incremental variational principles for the proposed dissipative material and demonstrate its modelling capabilities by means of finite element simulations of laminate formation and evolution in martensitic CuAlNi.

Acknowledgements

Support for this research was provided by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Cluster of Excellence in Simulation Technology (EXC 310/1) at the University of Stuttgart. Furthermore, fruitful discussions with Eric Jägle are gratefully acknowledged.

Notes

Notes

1. Associated with a node I of a standard finite element e, the interpolation matrix for two-dimensional problems d = 2 has the form

in terms of the nodal shape function N and its derivatives.

2. Alternatively, one can derive the micro-balance directly from the global dissipation inequality given by . Reducing this to the local statement , introducing a dissipation potential φ and enforcing then yields which is always satisfied for a positive, convex φ with φ = 0 for .

3. For the example of a two-dimensional problem d = 2 with the scalar micro-variable p, the nodal state vector in (Equation58) at the node I is

The constitutive state vector (Equation27) reads . Then, associated with node I of a standard finite element e, the finite element interpolation matrices in (Equation58) have the form

in terms of the shape function N I , M I at note I and their derivatives. For identical interpolations of micro- and macro-motions, we set M I  = N I .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.