In clinical practice there is an increasing emphasis on the need for informed consent and, correspondingly, whether individual patients are capable of giving informed consent. The wealth of recent law on this issue can be bewildering for clinicians for whom the formal assessment of capacity is still a rare clinical event. This paper reports the case of a man with both serious mental illness and a life threatening physical illness. It describes the role and limitations of different theoretical approaches to the assessment of capacity when applied to real life assessments. It places this in the context of recent governmental and legal advice on when, in such cases, doctors need to seek the help of the courts.
Refusal of treatment in a patient with fluctuating capacity - theory and practice
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.