Ageing in forensic psychiatric secure settings: the voice of older patients

ABSTRACT

Older patients account for around 20% of the population in secure forensic psychiatric services in the UK. However, little qualitative research has investigated the experience of ageing in secure settings. This study aimed to gather the individual views of a sample of patients over 50 years old in three services within the region of one NHS Trust in England providing different levels of security: high, medium and low. A total of 15 participants were selected and underwent one-on-one qualitative interviews. The interviews were analysed through thematic analysis, which generated seven themes: Self-agency, activities, social life, practical matters, recovery, physical health and service improvement. Study findings highlighted the complexity of ageing in secure settings. Despite the positive feedback reported in aspects such as physical health care, education opportunities, staff and support of religious practices, participants experienced added barriers to recovery, caused by social isolation/withdrawal and activities/treatment that did not respond to their complex age-related needs, generating poor motivation to engage, thus increasing length of stay in the institution. Our findings call for the development/implementation of programmes tailored to the unique needs of older patients. This process requires an active involvement of the primary stakeholders and further patient-centred research.

KEYWORDS:

• Older patients
• forensic psychiatry
• old age psychiatry
• secure services
• qualitative research

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. The Sage group is a monthly social event in the MS service. It is dedicated to older patients from across all wards, who gather to watch a film. Four of our participants from the MS service attended this group.

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands (CLAHRC EM). The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.