1,299
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Exploring the experiences of an autistic male convicted of stalking

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 461-494 | Received 06 Feb 2024, Accepted 01 Apr 2024, Published online: 09 Apr 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Despite an increasing number of studies which examine the interplay between autism and offending mechanisms, there has been a lack of research investigating the interplay between autism and stalking. It was anticipated that findings from this investigation would inform future interventions with individuals with autism who stalk. This secondary data analysis research used a qualitative case study approach to explore the experiences of an individual with a High Functioning Autism (HFA) diagnosis, who had been convicted of stalking. Interview data was analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis to gain a rich understanding of stalking behaviour from the perspective of the individual and to identify the key issues associated with Criminal Justice Service interventions. The following superordinate themes were identified; ‘What she means to me’, ‘Problematic, but unstoppable'’ and ‘Life after prison’. A key implication of the findings was that autistic traits can play a contextual role within stalking behaviour. Future recommendations of a specifically tailored treatment approach recognising and considering autism-related responsivity issues are discussed.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Services, Psychology Services Group, for their support in undertaking this research study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Declarations

The authors have no relevant financial, non-financial nor competing interests to disclose.

Two authors were employed by Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Services at the time of this study, which was carried out as part of their employment.

This study was undertaken with the support of Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Services and received Research ethics approval from the National Research Committee.

Consent from participants was not received to share raw data, hence this has not been made available.