335
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Analysis of timber transportation accident frequency, location, and contributing factors in Georgia, USA 2006-2016

Pages 109-120 | Received 01 Aug 2018, Accepted 26 Nov 2018, Published online: 18 Dec 2018
 

ABSTRACT

In the US South, the overwhelming majority of timber is transported from forests to mills by tractor-trailers. Therefore, safe and efficient timber transportation is critical for wood supply chain efficiency. Vehicle accident reports (DOT-523) were collected from the Georgia Department of Transportation for all accidents involving logging vehicles and other heavy vehicles for the years 2006–2016. Accident location, frequency, contributing factors, and vehicle condition were analyzed for the periods 2006–2009, 2010–2012, and 2013–2016. Logging vehicle accidents outside the Atlanta metro declined by nearly 70% from 2006 to 2013, but increased by 14% from 2014 to 2016. Accidents per million tonnes of timber hauled in the state declined from 11 in 2006–2009 to 4.2 in 2013–2016 (p < 0.01). The most common contributing factors to logging vehicle accidents were “following too close” in 2006–2009 and “misjudged clearance” in 2010–2012 and 2013–2016. Logging vehicles involved in accidents were older and in worse mechanical condition compared to other heavy vehicles. Since 2010, more than half of all logging vehicle accidents have occurred in urban areas. An average of fewer than 5% of accidents occurred on Interstate Highways, but 41% of accidents occurred within 8 km of an Interstate Highway 2013–2016. Overall, timber transportation safety improved between 2006 and 2016, but opportunities exist for further improvement. Reducing average age of logging vehicles, proactive maintenance, and investing in technology such as onboard cameras and GPS tracking may reduce logging vehicle accidents and improve timber transportation efficiency.

This article is part of the following collections:
Timber Truck Transportation in the 21st Century

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the Georgia Forestry Foundation Center for Forest Competitiveness for supporting this project.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded through a grant from the Georgia Forestry Foundation Center for Forest Competitiveness.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.