135
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Discrimination of release time constants in hearing-aid compressors

, &
Pages 189-198 | Received 31 Jul 2006, Published online: 07 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

We examined the ability of twenty-five hearing-impaired and eight normal-hearing listeners to discriminate between release time constants used for compression in hearing aids. The compressor was a standard three-channel system. The stimuli were normal and ‘vocoded’ sentences from a male and female database. In agreement with other studies looking at different outcomes, performance varied greatly across individuals. This variation was greater in hearing-impaired listeners, for whom the discriminability of a release time of 5 ms from one of 5000 ms (with the attack time fixed at 5 ms) ranged from chance to perfect. This variability was not significantly related to hearing impairment nor to individuals’ compression ratios.

Abbreviations
CT=

Compression thresholds (dB)

CR=

Compression ratio

GCAM65=

Insertion gain for a speech-shaped noise at 65 dB SPL (dB)

x=

Input level in a compression channel (dB)

GLD=

Level-dependent gain (dB)

GID=

Level-independent gain (dB)

Abbreviations
CT=

Compression thresholds (dB)

CR=

Compression ratio

GCAM65=

Insertion gain for a speech-shaped noise at 65 dB SPL (dB)

x=

Input level in a compression channel (dB)

GLD=

Level-dependent gain (dB)

GID=

Level-independent gain (dB)

Sumario

Examinamos la habilidad de veinticinco hipoacúsicos y ocho normoyentes para discriminar entre la liberación de constantes de tiempo utilizadas para la compresión en auxiliares auditivos. El compresor fue un sistema estándar de tres canales. Los estímulos fueron frases con voces masculinas y femeninas de una base de datos, normales y distorsionadas con vocoder. En concordancia con otros estudios el desempeño varió ampliamente entre individuos. Estas variaciones fueron mayores entre los hipoacúsicos para quienes la discriminación de un tiempo de liberación de 5 ms contra uno de 5000 ms (con el tiempo de ataque fijo en 5 ms) varió del azar a la perfección. Esta variabilidad no se relacionó significativamente con la desventaja auditiva ni con los rangos individuales de compresión.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.