Affordable headphones for accessible screening audiometry: An evaluation of the Sennheiser HD202 II supra-aural headphone

Mathieu Van der AerschotDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,

De Wet SwanepoelDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, ;Ear Sciences Centre, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia, ;Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia, ;Callier Center for Communication Disorders, University of Texas at Dallas, TX, USA, and Correspondence[email protected]

Faheema Mahomed-AsmailDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,

Herman Carel MyburghDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Robert Henry EikelboomDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, ;Ear Sciences Centre, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia, ;Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia,

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of the Sennheiser HD 202 II supra-aural headphones as an alternative headphone to enable more affordable hearing screening. Design: Study 1 measured the equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPL) of the Sennheiser HD 202 II. Study 2 evaluated the attenuation of the headphones. Study 3 determined headphone characteristics by analyzing the total harmonic distortion (THD), frequency response and force of the headband. Study sample: Twenty-five participants were included in study 1 and 15 in study 2 with ages ranging between 18 and 25. No participants were involved in study 3. Results: The Sennheiser HD 202 II ETSPLs (250–16000 Hz) showed no significant effects on ETSPL for ear laterality, gender or age. Attenuation was not significantly different (p > 0.01) to TDH 39 except at 8000 Hz (p < 0.01). Maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANL) were specified accordingly. The force of the headband was 3.1N. THD measurements showed that between 500 and 8000 Hz intensities of 90 dB HL and higher can be reached without THD >3%. Conclusion: Sennheiser HD 202 II supra-aural headphones can be used as an affordable headphone for screening audiometry provided reported MPANLs, maximum intensities and ETSPL values are employed.

Key Words:

Declaration of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Affordable headphones for accessible screening audiometry: An evaluation of the Sennheiser HD202 II supra-aural headphone

Declaration of interest

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Affordable headphones for accessible screening audiometry: An evaluation of the Sennheiser HD202 II supra-aural headphone

Abstract

Declaration of interest

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature