1,454
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Developing the auditory processing domains questionnaire (APDQ): a differential screening tool for auditory processing disorder

&
Pages 764-775 | Received 16 Oct 2017, Accepted 04 Jun 2018, Published online: 31 Jul 2018
 

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a screening questionnaire for auditory processing disorder (APD).

Design: Fifty-two questions were created to enable parent/teacher proxies to rate students listening skills in terms of auditory processing, attention and language factors.

Study sample: Parents rated their child’s frequency of competent performance (regularly, often, sometimes or rarely) on 52 questions. Scores were calculated for three scales: auditory processing, attention and language. Data was collected from 198 normal controls, 20 students with auditory processing disorder, 40 students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and 10 students with a learning disability. Subjects were split into a younger group (7–10 y) and an older group (11–17 y).

Results: Factor analysis revealed substantial internal validity. Analysis of external validity using a regression model revealed significant differences between normal and clinical groups for all scales (p < 0.001) and also significantly separated the three clinical groups. A group differential analysis of scale score results clearly demonstrated inter-group differences at 89% (on average) sensitivity and specificity levels.

Conclusion: The auditory processing domains questionnaire appears to be an effective screening questionnaire for APD with scale score patterns likely to be helpful in making appropriate clinical referrals.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Kaiser Hawaii Center for Health Research for enabling the collection of the subject data, Tim Holmes for developing the Excel scoring sheet and Mark Seeto for statistical advice. We also thank Harvey Dillon and Sharon Cameron for their helpful assistance.

Declaration of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.