357
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Hearing and ear status of Pacific children aged 11 years living in New Zealand: the Pacific Islands families hearing study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 77-86 | Received 15 Mar 2018, Accepted 25 Jul 2018, Published online: 27 Sep 2018
 

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of hearing loss and ear problems in Pacific children, and investigate current and past demographic, health and social factors potentially associated with hearing and ear problems.

Design: A cross-sectional observational study design nested within a birth cohort was employed.

Study sample: Nine-hundred-twenty Pacific children aged 11 years were audiologically assessed. Using average hearing thresholds at 500, 1k and 2k Hz, 162 (18%) right and 197 (21%) left ears had ≥20 dB hearing loss. Hearing loss was mild (20–39 dB) in most cases; 2% of ears had moderate to moderate-severe (40–69 dB) hearing loss. However, only 101 (11%) children had normal peripheral hearing defined by passing hearing threshold, tympanogram and distortion product otoacoustic emission assessments. Those with confirmed middle ear disease at age 2 years had significantly increased odds of a non-Type A tympanogram (adjusted odds ratio: 2.00; 95% confidence interval: 1.56, 2.50) when re-assessed at age 11 years.

Conclusions: Hearing loss, abnormal tympanograms, and auditory processing difficulties were present in many Pacific children. Interventions are also urgently needed to mitigate the effect of the longstanding ear disease likely to be present for many Pacific children.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Counties Manukau Health otolaryngology and audiology clinics for their support of the participants in this study, the PIF Hearing Study assessors Julie Hill, Annie Belanger, and Chloe Young, and Amor Hirao and the other members of the PIF study research team.

Disclosure statement

S.P., P.J.S., Z.A., G.S., and J.P. declare contribution to their salary via the HRC research grant. The funding agency had no role in the design and conduct of the study, management, analyses, interpretation of the results or in the preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. For the remaining authors, no conflicts of interests were declared.

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by the Health Research Council (HRC) of New Zealand [Ref: 10/589].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.