Abstract
Objective
We aimed to update the prevalence estimates of hearing loss in older adults in England using a nationally representative sample of adults aged 50 years old and older.
Design
A comparative cross-sectional study design was implemented. Hearing loss was defined as ≥35 dB HL at 3.0 kHz, as measured via Hearcheck in the better-hearing ear.
Study sample
We compared the estimates based on the English census in 2015 to estimates from psychoacoustic hearing data available for 8,263 participants in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) Wave 7 (2014–2015).
Results
Marked regional variability in hearing loss prevalence was revealed among participants with similar age profiles. The regional differences in hearing outcomes reached up to 13.53% in those belonging to the 71–80 years old group; the prevalence of hearing loss was 49.22% in the North East of England (95%CI 48.0–50.4), versus 35.69% in the South East (95%CI 34.8–36.50).
Conclusion
A socio-spatial approach in planning sustainable models of hearing care based on the actual populations’ needs and not on age demographics might offer a viable opportunity for healthier lives. Regular assessment of the extent and causality of the population’s different audiological needs within the country is strongly supported.
Acknowledgements
DT thanks Amy Craddock, Research and Policy Officer at the Royal National Institute for Deaf People (RNID), for the collaboration in summarising the prevalence of hearing loss at ≥35 dB HL in Hearing in Adults study, including the table reference (provided as ).
Ethics approval
Ethical approval for all the ELSA Waves was granted from the National Research and Ethics Committee (MREC/01/2/91).
Informed consent from participants
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Details of the ELSA study design, sample and data collection are available at the ELSA’s project website (https://www.elsa-project.ac.uk/).
Author contributions
DT was responsible for the conceptualisation, and all authors were responsible for developing the design of the study. DT was responsible for conducting the analyses and mapping, interpreting the results, and drafting the manuscript. DT, MP, and EK critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Data availability statement
The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing dataset is available via the UK Data Service (http://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk). Statistical code is available from the corresponding author upon request at [email protected].