1,429
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Motion of animated streamlets appears to surpass their graphical alterations in human visual detection of vector field maxima

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 489-501 | Received 21 May 2018, Accepted 25 Nov 2018, Published online: 10 Jan 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Animations have become a frequently utilized illustration technique on maps but changes in their graphical loading remain understudied in empirical geovisualization and cartographic research. Animated streamlets have gained attention as an illustrative animation technique and have become popular on widely viewed maps. We conducted an experiment to investigate how altering four major animation parameters of animated streamlets affects people’s reading performance of field maxima on vector fields. The study involved 73 participants who performed reaction-time tasks on pointing maxima on vector field stimuli. Reaction times and correctness of answers changed surprisingly little between visually different animations, with only a few occasional statistical significances. The results suggest that motion of animated streamlets is such a strong visual cue that altering graphical parameters makes only little difference when searching for the maxima. This leads to the conclusion that, for this kind of a task, animated streamlets on maps can be designed relatively freely in graphical terms and their style fitted to other contents of the map. In the broader visual and geovisual analytics context, the results can lead to more generally hypothesizing that graphical loading of animations with continuous motion flux could be altered without severely affecting their communicative power.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge CSC – IT Center for Science, Finland, for server resources. Our most sincere thanks go to each and every experimentee. We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers and the editors of the journal for their important contributions in improving the article for publication.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.