252
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLE

Revisiting Narrative Elaboration Training with an Ecologically Relevant Event

, &
Pages 154-174 | Published online: 04 Jan 2013
 

Abstract

A problematic issue for forensic interviewers is that young children provide limited information in response to open-ended recall questions. Although quantity of information is greater if children are asked more focused prompts and closed question types such as yes/no or forced choice questions, the quality of their responses is potentially problematic for a number of reasons. Consequently, a key goal of forensic interviewers is to maximize how much information children provide in open-ended recall. In the current study, 52 3–7-year-old children (mean age 5;2) were interviewed about a highly stressful real-life event, specifically an injury requiring hospital emergency room treatment. Half were given Narrative Elaboration (NE) training prior to the interview. Such training involves cue cards that encourage information about participants, setting, actions, and conversations/cognitions/affective states—all of which is important in forensic interviews. NE-trained children not only provided more information in open-ended recall but they also provided longer, more emotionally evaluated, more descriptive and more coherent open-ended recall than did controls. This is the first study of NE when real life, emotionally charged events are used, as well as the first examining NE-facilitated improvements in the quality of memory reports in terms of coherence and credibility variables. Forensic implications are discussed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Preparation of this article was primarily supported by Grant 513-02 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to C. Peterson. Additional funding came from the Memorial University Undergraduate Career Experience Program, the Student Work and Service Program, and the Summer Career Placement Program.

We extend our thanks to the Janeway Hospital and their emergency room staff, and to all the recruiters, interviewers, transcribers, and data analyzers who participated. We also thank Penny Voutier for myriad helpfulness and Malcolm Grant for statistical consultation. And most of all, we thank the parents and children who allowed us into their homes and cooperated so helpfully.

Notes

1Open-ended recall includes free recall + NE-cued recall for NE-group children and free recall only for control children.

1Open-ended recall includes free recall + NE-cued recall for NE children and free recall only for control children.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Kelly L. Warren

Kelly L. Warren is now at the Department of Psychology, Memorial University Grenfell Campus.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.