191
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluating an Alternative Method for Rapid Urinary Creatinine Determination

, , , &
 

Abstract

Creatinine (CR) is an endogenously produced chemical that is routinely assayed in urine specimens to assess kidney function and sample dilution. The industry-standard method for CR determination, known as the kinetic Jaffé (KJ) method, relies on an exponential rate of a colorimetric change, and can therefore require automated processing equipment for moderate- to high-throughput analysis (hundreds to thousands of samples per day). This study evaluates an alternative colorimetric method, the “plateau Jaffé” (PJ) method, which utilizes the chemistry of the KJ method, a commercially available kit, and a multipoint calibration curve. This method is amenable to moderate-throughput sample analysis and does not require automated processing equipment. Thirty-two spot urine samples from healthy adult volunteers were analyzed for creatinine concentration (CRc) using the KJ and PJ methods. Samples were also analyzed using a liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-TOF/MS) method, which acted as an analytical control. Replicate measurements of spot samples (natural log-transformed values) were used to estimate method precision, and linear regression models were used to evaluate method accuracy (LC-TOF/MS measurements were considered the analytical benchmark). Measurement precision was comparable across all three methods, with coefficent of variation estimates ranging from 3 to 6%. Regression models generally showed good agreement across methods with R2 estimates ranging from .996 to .998, slope estimates ranging from .944 to .986, and y-intercept estimates ranging from 0.111 to 0.303. Minor bias (between 2 and 16%) was observed across methods at the tails of the measurement distributions. The provided regression equations can be used to adjust for this bias and to improve CR measurement comparisons across studies employing different methods. Considering these results, the PJ method is a suitable alternative to the industry standard KJ method for urinary CRc determination. It can be implemented for moderate-throughput sample analysis using modest and commonly available lab instrumentation and manual sample preparation techniques.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Urine samples were provided by Marsha Morgan of the U.S. EPA. The authors are grateful for the expert advice and assistance from Andrew Lindstrom, Michael Madden, Donald Whitaker, Marsha Morgan, Matthew Clifton, Lillian Alston, and Peter Egeghy of the U.S. EPA.

FUNDING

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development funded and managed the research described here. It has been subjected to agency review and approved for publication.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.