18
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Quantitative predictivity of the transformation in vitro assay compared with the ames test

, , , , , & show all
Pages 483-510 | Received 04 Mar 1983, Accepted 15 Jul 1983, Published online: 19 Oct 2009
 

Abstract

For 59 chemical compounds, we have found homogeneous data on transformation in vitro, mutagenicity in the Ames test, and carcinogenicity. We have compared the potency in inducing transformation in vitro in hamster fibroblast cells with the carcinogenic potency and found a modest correlation coefficient between the two parameters (T=0.37). For these same 59 compounds it was also possible to compare mutagenic potency in the Ames test with carcinogenic potency. The correlation level was very similar (r = 0.34). The predictivity of transformation in vitro increased significantly when only compounds for which some kind of dose‐response relationship was available were utilized (x = 0.65). This result stresses the importance of the quantitative aspect of the response in predictivity studies. The present study is compared with previous studies on the quantitative predictivity of different short‐term tests. Our work is not definitive, but gives an idea of the possible type of approach to the problem of comparing quantitative predictivities.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.