18
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Physiological and Subjective Responses to Working in Disposable Protective Coveralls and Respirators Commonly Used by the Asbestos Abatement Industry

, &
Pages 313-319 | Published online: 04 Jun 2010
 

Abstract

The physiological and subjective effects of working with different respirators while wearing lightweight disposable (Tyvek® 1412 polyclefin) coveralls commonly used by the asbestos abatement industry were studied. Nine healthy men (mean age=27.3 yr, weight=76.9 kg) each performed a series of four exercise tests with four different respirator ensembles in counterbalanced order. Treadmill work was performed at a set walking speed of 4 kph (2.5 mph), 0 percent elevation (220 kcal/hr), a controlled environmental temperature of 33.9°C, and 50% relative humidity. Each test continued up to 120 min, with repeated work/rest intervals of 26 min of work and 4 min of rest. Tyvek disposable coveralls and hoods were worn with each of these four different respirator ensembles: (1) control—a lightweight, low resistance mask; (2) HEPA—an air purifying, full facepicce respirator with dual high efficiency filters; (3) SAR—a supplied-air, pressure-demand respirator with escape filter; (4) SCBA—an open circuit, pressure-demand, self-contained breathing apparatus. Physiological measurements obtained every minute during each test included heart rate and skin and rectal temperatures. Subjective evaluations of clothing, respirator, and facepiece comfort, ease of breathing, temperature and perspiration in the mask and clothing, and respirator load also were measured at the end of the test. Data were analyzed using an analysis of variance. Results indicated that heart rate at the end of the test differed by less than 8 BPM between the control condition and the SCBA (heaviest) condition. Skin and rectal temperatures also were quite similar across experimental conditions (within approximately 0.2°C for skin temperature and 0.1°C for rectal temperature). Subjective ratings followed a similar trend, with only perceived respirator load being significantly different between ensembles. These results suggest that heavier, more protective respirators may be associated with only minimal additional physiological and subjective stress in selected low work load asbestos abatement industry work settings.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.