Abstract
Personal microenvironmental cooling has been used to enhance safety and extend the work capacity of laborers wearing protective clothing. Previous studies of air and liquid cooling have used either very low work rates or high environmental temperatures. Emergency work tasks frequently require high work rates and occur in moderate ambient temperatures. The purpose of this research was to examine the efficacy of intermittent personal cooling during rest and to compare liquid and air cooling systems in subjects engaged in hard work. Fourteen volunteers wearing chemical protective clothing performed treadmill walking at a metabolic rate of 430 W for 45 min followed by a 15-min rest at a wet-bulb globe temperature of 25°C. During rest, volunteers received either no cooling, air cooling, or liquid cooling. Both cooling systems partially alleviated heat strain and increased work time with the air system offering slightly more effective cooling.