353
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Unreliability and Error in the Military's “Gold Standard” Measure of Sexual Harassment by Education and Gender

, , , , , & show all
Pages 216-231 | Received 22 Jun 2009, Accepted 17 Feb 2010, Published online: 29 Apr 2011
 

Abstract

The Department of Defense's “gold standard” sexual harassment measure, the Sexual Harassment Core Measure (SHCore), is based on an earlier measure that was developed primarily in college women. Furthermore, the SHCore requires a reading grade level of 9.1. This may be higher than some troops' reading abilities and could generate unreliable estimates of their sexual harassment experiences. Results from 108 male and 96 female soldiers showed that the SHCore's temporal stability and alternate-forms reliability was significantly worse (a) in soldiers without college experience compared to soldiers with college experience and (b) in men compared to women. For men without college experience, almost 80% of the temporal variance in SHCore scores was attributable to error. A plain language version of the SHCore had mixed effects on temporal stability depending on education and gender. The SHCore may be particularly ill suited for evaluating population trends of sexual harassment in military men without college experience.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Service (IIR 96-014). Drs. Murdoch, Griffin, and Polusny are core investigators for the Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research (CCDOR). CCDOR is a VA HSR&D Service Center of Excellence. The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful critiques. The views, opinions, and findings are the authors' and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Departments of Veterans Affairs or Defense.

Notes

1. The 12-item SHCore had a correlation of .96 with the Department of Defense's original SEQ version. The 16-item SHCore-PL had a correlation of .96 with the 31-item plain language SEQ version. Analyses of the Department of Defense's full SEQ version and its plain language counterpart are available on request and essentially mirror the results reported here.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.