195
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Organic carbon fluxes using column leaching experiments in soil treated with pig slurry in SE Spain

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 136-151 | Received 30 Oct 2018, Accepted 17 Jun 2019, Published online: 04 Jul 2019
 

Abstract

In semi-arid climates, the management of pig slurry is very important, since it may cause an environmental problem, but on the other hand it has positive impacts such as high labile and organic carbon content. Leaching experiments were carried out to establish the mechanism of soil C dynamics using the raw pig slurry with legislated doses (LD) (170 kg ha−1 year−1) and the high doses (HD) (510 kg ha−1 year−1). Organic carbon (OC) content of the soil ranged between 6.81 and 15.50 tons OC ha−1 at the beginning, which ranged between 11.39 and 26.26 tons OC ha−1 at the end of the experiment and significantly increased with the HD, especially in the subsurface zone. Carbon lost from the soil respiration was ∼0.01 ton C–CO2 month−1 ha−1 in control and varied between 0.01 and 2.30 ton C–CO2 month−1 ha−1 in LD, and 0.01 and 7.16 ton C–CO2 month−1 ha−1 in HD, respectively. The losses of OC by leaching from dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were 0.15, 0.07, and 16.30% with LD, HD, and the control (CT), respectively. Dissolved OC content in leachates was lower in LD treatment than in HD treatment. The changes of OC from the beginning were between +15.85, +24.65, and −0.8% (+1.97, +3.15, and −0.11 ton OC ha−1) with LD, HD, and CT, respectively. Results suggest that the agronomic rate (LD) application could be considered as a fertilizer treatment in terms of soil C sequestration.

Acknowledgments

We thank, M. D. Estévez Rodríguez and Dr. D. M. Carmona Garcés for their assistance and providing background knowledge during the field and laboratory studies.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.