“There was a lot of that [coercion and manipulation] happening and well, that’s not very trustworthy”: a qualitative study on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Canada

ABSTRACT

Although a large proportion of the Canadian population is fully vaccinated against COVID-19, millions of eligible individuals remain unvaccinated. Trust in public health and government impacts the effectiveness of crisis communication and the public’s willingness to follow health recommendations. This qualitative study involved semistructured interviews with 12 COVID-19 vaccine-hesitant adults in Canada. Using thematic analysis, four themes were generated, including (1) perceived low use of crisis communication guiding principles contributes to distrust in officials; (2) risk perception and decisions are influenced by a range of sources; (3) concerns regarding vaccine safety, the industry, and politicization of efforts are impacting trust; and (4) stigma around vaccine status further entrenches views and erodes trust. This study highlights the importance of trust and how vaccine hesitancy is fueled by perceived ineffective crisis communication by officials.

KEYWORDS:

• COVID-19
• vaccine hesitancy
• trust
• crisis communication
• stigma
• risk perception

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Public Health Agency of Canada, “Vaccines for COVID-19,” navigation page - topic page, December 16, 2020, https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/vaccines.html.

2 Public Health Agency of Canada, “COVID-19 Vaccine Safety: Weekly Report on Side Effects Following Immunization,” datasets;statistics;education and awareness, January 8, 2021, https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/.

3 Public Health Agency of Canada, “COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Intent: Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) Insight,” surveys, December 16, 2021, https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/vaccines-immunization/covid-19-vaccine-uptake-intent-canadian-community-health-survey.html.

4 World Health Organization, “Ten Threats to Global Health in 2019,” 2019, https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019.

5 Eve Dubé et al., “Vaccine Hesitancy,” Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 9, no. 8 (August 8, 2013): 1763–73, https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.24657.

6 Janessa Griffith, Husayn Marani, and Helen Monkman, “COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Canada: Content Analysis of Tweets Using the Theoretical Domains Framework,” Journal of Medical Internet Research 23, no. 4 (April 13, 2021): e26874, https://doi.org/10.2196/26874.

7 Shingai Machingaidze and Charles Shey Wiysonge, “Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy,” Nature Medicine 27, no. 8 (August 2021): 1338–39, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01459-7.

8 Omid V. Ebrahimi et al., “Risk, Trust, and Flawed Assumptions: Vaccine Hesitancy During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Frontiers in Public Health 9 (2021), https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2021.700213.

9 Griffith, Marani, and Monkman, “COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Canada.”

10 Ebrahimi et al., “Risk, Trust, and Flawed Assumptions.”

11 Harjit Sekhon et al., “Trustworthiness and Trust: Influences and Implications,” Journal of Marketing Management 30, no. 3–4 (March 2014): 409–30, https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.842609.

12 OECD, “Transparency, Communication and Trust: The Role of Public Communication in Responding to the Wave of Disinformation about the New Coronavirus,” Tackling Coronavirus (COVID-19) Contributing to a Global Effort, July 3, 2020, https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/transparency-communication-and-trust-bef7ad6e/.

13 Sekhon et al., “Trustworthiness and Trust.”

14 Bobbi Morrison, Todd A. Boyle, and Thomas Mahaffey, “Demonstrating Institutional Trustworthiness: A Framework for Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities,” Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, May 2022, S1551741122001498, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.04.007.

15 Daisy Fancourt, Andrew Steptoe, and Liam Wright, “The Cummings Effect: Politics, Trust, and Behaviours during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” The Lancet 396, no. 10249 (August 15, 2020): 464–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31690-1.

16 Richard G. Peters, Vincent T. Covello, and David B. McCallum, “The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study,” Risk Analysis 17, no. 1 (1997): 43–54, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00842.x.

17 Bernadette Hyland-Wood et al., “Toward Effective Government Communication Strategies in the Era of COVID-19,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8, no. 1 (January 27, 2021): 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00701-w.

18 Wouter Jong, “Evaluating Crisis Communication. A 30-Item Checklist for Assessing Performance during COVID-19 and Other Pandemics,” Journal of Health Communication 25, no. 12 (December 1, 2020): 962–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1871791.

19 CDC, “CERC Manual | Crisis & Emergency Risk Communication (CERC),” January 23, 2018, https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/manual/index.asp.

20 CDC.

21 CDC; B Henry, “Canadian Pandemic Influenza Preparedness: Communications Strategy,” Canada Communicable Disease Report 44, no. 5 (May 3, 2018): 106–9, https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v44i05a03; Daniela Ghio et al., “What Influences People’s Responses to Public Health Messages for Managing Risks and Preventing Infectious Diseases? A Rapid Systematic Review of the Evidence and Recommendations” (PsyArXiv, July 13, 2020), https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nz7tr; Julie Henderson et al., “Developing and Maintaining Public Trust During and Post-COVID-19: Can We Apply a Model Developed for Responding to Food Scares?,” Frontiers in Public Health 8 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00369; Elaine Vaughan and Timothy Tinker, “Effective Health Risk Communication About Pandemic Influenza for Vulnerable Populations,” American Journal of Public Health 99, no. S2 (October 2009): S324–32, https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537.

22 CDC, “CERC Manual | Crisis & Emergency Risk Communication (CERC)”; Henderson et al., “Developing and Maintaining Public Trust During and Post-COVID-19.”

23 Henderson et al., “Developing and Maintaining Public Trust During and Post-COVID-19”; Hyland-Wood et al., “Toward Effective Government Communication Strategies in the Era of COVID-19”; OECD, “Transparency, Communication and Trust: The Role of Public Communication in Responding to the Wave of Disinformation about the New Coronavirus.”

24 CDC, “CERC Manual | Crisis & Emergency Risk Communication (CERC)”; Hyland-Wood et al., “Toward Effective Government Communication Strategies in the Era of COVID-19.”

25 David Ortiz-Paredes et al., “Reasons for COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal among People Incarcerated in Canadian Federal Prisons,” PLOS ONE 17, no. 3 (March 9, 2022): e0264145, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264145.

26 Madeleine Mant et al., “University Students’ Perspectives, Planned Uptake, and Hesitancy Regarding the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Multi-Methods Study,” PLOS ONE 16, no. 8 (August 3, 2021): e0255447, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255447.

27 Carmel Bradshaw, Sandra Atkinson, and Owen Doody, “Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research,” Global Qualitative Nursing Research 4 (November 24, 2017): 2333393617742282, https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282.

28 Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2 (January 1, 2006): 77–101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

29 Allison Tong, Peter Sainsbury, and Jonathan Craig, “Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups,” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19, no. 6 (December 1, 2007): 349–57, https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.

30 CDC, “CERC Manual | Crisis & Emergency Risk Communication (CERC).”

31 Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Teams, version 1.5.00.11163 (U.S.A, 2022), https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/group-chat-software.

32 Braun and Clarke, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.”

33 QSR International Pty Ltd., NVivo, version 12 Plus, 2020, https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home.

34 Braun and Clarke, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.”

35 Greg Guest, Emily Namey, and Mario Chen, “A Simple Method to Assess and Report Thematic Saturation in Qualitative Research,” PLOS ONE 15, no. 5 (May 5, 2020): e0232076, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076.

36 Greg Guest, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson, “How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability,” Field Methods 18, no. 1 (February 2006): 59–82, https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903.

37 Kristen M C Malecki, Julie A Keating, and Nasia Safdar, “Crisis Communication and Public Perception of COVID-19 Risk in the Era of Social Media,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 72, no. 4 (February 16, 2021): 697–702, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa758.

38 Timothy Caulfield et al., “Let’s Do Better: Public Representations of COVID-19 Science,” FACETS 6 (January 1, 2021): 403–23, https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2021-0018.

39 Molly A. Sauer et al., “A Failure to Communicate? How Public Messaging Has Strained the COVID-19 Response in the United States,” Health Security 19, no. 1 (February 1, 2021): 65–74, https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2020.0190.

40 Henderson et al., “Developing and Maintaining Public Trust During and Post-COVID-19.”

41 Jeremy K. Ward et al., “The French Health Pass Holds Lessons for Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination,” Nature Medicine 28, no. 2 (February 2022): 232–35, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01661-7.

42 Michael Bang Petersen et al., “Transparent Communication about Negative Features of COVID-19 Vaccines Decreases Acceptance but Increases Trust,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, no. 29 (July 20, 2021), https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024597118.

43 David A. Broniatowski, Mark Dredze, and John W. Ayers, “‘First Do No Harm’: Effective Communication About COVID-19 Vaccines,” American Journal of Public Health 111, no. 6 (June 2021): 1055–57, https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306288.

44 Broniatowski, Dredze, and Ayers.

45 David De Coninck et al., “Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation About COVID-19: Comparative Perspectives on the Role of Anxiety, Depression and Exposure to and Trust in Information Sources,” Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021), https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646394.

46 A. Gagneux-Brunon et al., “Intention to Get Vaccinations against COVID-19 in French Healthcare Workers during the First Pandemic Wave: A Cross-Sectional Survey,” Journal of Hospital Infection 108 (February 1, 2021): 168–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.020; Paul L. Reiter, Michael L. Pennell, and Mira L. Katz, “Acceptability of a COVID-19 Vaccine among Adults in the United States: How Many People Would Get Vaccinated?,” Vaccine 38, no. 42 (September 29, 2020): 6500–6507, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.043.

47 Mitchell Liester, “A Review of the Use of Persuasion and Coercion to Overcome COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy – Journal of PeerScientist,” Journal of PeerScientist 4, no. 2 (2021): e1000037, https://peerscientist.com/a-review-of-the-use-of-persuasion-and-coercion-to-overcome-covid-19-vaccine-hesitancy/.

48 Naomi J. Patterson et al., “Exploring Perceived Risk for COVID-19 and Its Role in Protective Behavior and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Qualitative Study after the First Wave,” BMC Public Health 22, no. 1 (March 15, 2022): 503, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12900-y.

49 Patterson et al.

50 Maya J. Goldenberg, Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science (University of Pittsburgh Press, 2021).

51 Toby Bolsen and Risa Palm, “Politicization and COVID-19 Vaccine Resistance in the U.S.,” Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science 188, no. 1 (2022): 81–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.10.002; Wolfgang Stroebe et al., “Politicization of COVID-19 Health-Protective Behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and Cross-National Evidence,” PLOS ONE 16, no. 10 (October 20, 2021): e0256740, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256740.

52 Bolsen and Palm, “Politicization and COVID-19 Vaccine Resistance in the U.S.”

53 Goldenberg, Vaccine Hesitancy; Henderson et al., “Developing and Maintaining Public Trust During and Post-COVID-19”; Patterson et al., “Exploring Perceived Risk for COVID-19 and Its Role in Protective Behavior and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.”

54 Patterson et al., “Exploring Perceived Risk for COVID-19 and Its Role in Protective Behavior and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.”

55 Heather Mallick, “The Unvaccinated Cherish Their Freedom to Harm Others. How Can We Ever Forgive Them? | The Star,” January 15, 2022, https://www.thestar.com/politics/political-opinion/2022/01/15/the-unvaccinated-cherish-their-freedom-to-harm-others-how-can-we-ever-forgive-them.html.

56 Ward et al., “The French Health Pass Holds Lessons for Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination.”

57 Johan Christiaan Bester, “Vaccine Refusal and Trust: The Trouble With Coercion and Education and Suggestions for a Cure,” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12, no. 4 (December 2015): 555–59, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-015-9673-1.

58 Mallick, “The Unvaccinated Cherish Their Freedom to Harm Others. How Can We Ever Forgive Them? | The Star.”

59 Salvador Rodriguez, “Reddit Channel Posts Stories of Anti-Vaxxers Dying of Covid, Scaring Fence-Sitters into Getting the Shot,” CNBC, October 16, 2021, https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/16/reddit-r/hermancainaward-posts-stories-of-anti-vaxxers-dying-of-covid.html.

60 Alberto Giubilini and Julian Savulescu, “Shaming Unvaccinated People Has to Stop. We’ve Turned into an Angry Mob and It’s Getting Ugly,” The Conversation, December 15, 2021, http://theconversation.com/shaming-unvaccinated-people-has-to-stop-weve-turned-into-an-angry-mob-and-its-getting-ugly-173137.

61 Magdalena Rewerska-Juśko and Konrad Rejdak, “Social Stigma of Patients Suffering from COVID-19: Challenges for Health Care System,” Healthcare 10, no. 2 (February 2, 2022): 292, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020292.

62 R. Armitage, “Online ‘Anti-Vax’ Campaigns and COVID-19: Censorship Is Not the Solution,” Public Health 190 (January 2021): e29–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.12.005.

63 Kiran Shafiq Khan et al., “The Mental Health Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Across Different Cohorts,” International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 20, no. 1 (February 1, 2022): 380–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00367-0.

64 Magda Borkowska and James Laurence, “Coming Together or Coming Apart? Changes in Social Cohesion during the Covid-19 Pandemic in England,” European Societies 23, no. sup1 (February 19, 2021): S618–36, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1833067.

65 Editorial Board, “White Supremacists at the ‘Freedom Convoy’ Aren’t Just a Few Bad Apples,” The McGill Daily (blog), February 7, 2022, https://www.mcgilldaily.com/2022/02/white-supremacists-at-the-freedom-convoy-arent-just-a-few-bad-apples/.

66 Justin Ling, “5G and QAnon: How Conspiracy Theorists Steered Canada’s Anti-Vaccine Trucker Protest,” The Guardian, February 8, 2022, sec. World news, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/08/canada-ottawa-trucker-protest-extremist-qanon-neo-nazi.