Abstract
New ionic multi‐component complexes (TBPDA)2·(C60 •−)·(D+), where TBPDA is N,N,N′,N′‐tetrabenzyl‐p‐phenylenediamine and D is decamethylchromocene (Cp∗2Cr, 1), decamethylcobaltocene (Cp∗2Co, 2), and tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene (TDAE, 3). The presence of D+, C60 •− and neutral TBPDA in 1–3 was proved by the IR and UV‐visible‐NIR spectra. D+ and C60 •− form loose layers in 1 and 3 and are spatially separated by bulky TBPDA molecules. The EPR spectra of the complexes show single Lorentzian line with g=2.2526 and ΔH=215 mT (1), g=1.9999 and ΔH=6.7 mT (2), and g=2.0009 and ΔH of 2.93 mT (3) at RT. The EPR signal of 2 was attributed to C60 •− (Cp∗2Co+ is diamagnetic), whereas those in 1 and 3 to resonating signal between C60 •− (g=1.9996–2.0000) and cations Cp∗2Cr+ (1) or TDAE•+ (3) due to indirect coupling. The EPR signals from 2 and 3 are split into two components below 50 and 60 K and the magnetic moments of 1–3 decrease below 50–100 K. Both effects are associated with the formation of field‐induced short‐range antiferromagnetically ordered clusters. It was shown that D+ cations do not noticeably affect the antiferromagnetic interaction of spins in 1–3 probably due to their isolation by benzyl groups of TBPDA.
Acknowledgements
The work was partly supported by Grant‐in‐Aid Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (152005019, and COE programs, the RFBR grant N 03‐03‐32699, the Russian Science Support Foundation and INTAS YSF 05‐109‐4653.