Caregivers’ Advice and Children’s Bystander Behaviors During Bullying Incidents

Abstract

Many bullying prevention programs take a bystander approach, which encourages children to intervene when they are bystanders to bullying incidents. Little is known about how caregivers’ advice to children might promote or undermine the positive bystander behaviors targeted by these programs. Accordingly, the aim of the current study was to investigate relations between caregivers’ advice and children’s bystander behavior during bullying situations. Participants were 106 racially/ethnically diverse 4th- and 5th-grade students (M age = 10.5 years, SD = .71 years), their classmates, and their caregivers. During classroom visits, peers reported on children’s bystander behaviors. During home visits, caregivers and children completed a coded interaction task in which caregivers advised children about how to respond to bullying situations at school. Results suggested that (a) bystander intervention was positively predicted by caregivers’ advice to help/comfort the victim, (b) bystander passivity was positively predicted by caregivers’ advice to not intervene and negatively predicted by caregivers’ advice to help/comfort the victim, and (c) bystander reinforcement/assistance of the bully was positively predicted by caregivers’ advice not to intervene and not to tell adults. Results support a link between caregivers’ advice at home and children’s corresponding behavior when they are bystanders to bullying situations at school. These results emphasize the importance of collaboration between families and schools to reduce school bullying. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

FUNDING

Funding was provided by the Fahs-Beck Fund for Research and Experimentation, the Philadelphia Society for Psychoanalytic Psychology, the Delaware Bar Foundation, the University of Delaware General University Research Grant, and the Delaware Criminal Justice Council.

Additional information

Funding

Funding was provided by the Fahs-Beck Fund for Research and Experimentation, the Philadelphia Society for Psychoanalytic Psychology, the Delaware Bar Foundation, the University of Delaware General University Research Grant, and the Delaware Criminal Justice Council.