475
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Interplay of Familial and Individual Risk in Predicting Clinical Improvements in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
 

Abstract

Bioecological models of developmental psychopathology underscore the role of familial experiences of adversity and children’s individual-level characteristics in heightening risk for pediatric anxiety through direct, combined, and interactive effects. To date, much of the existing research dedicated to pediatric anxiety disorders has largely been examined in bioecological models of diathesis-stress using community samples. This study extends our understanding of children’s differential responsiveness to familial adversity by examining the diathesis-stress interaction of cumulative risk and children’s individual-level vulnerabilities (negative affectivity and coping efficacy) within a clinic-referred treatment study for pediatric anxiety disorders. A cumulative risk index assessing exposure to familial adversity (e.g., socioeconomic status [SES], parent psychiatric illness) and self-reported measures of children’s negative affectivity and coping efficacy were each measured at the intake of a randomized controlled clinical trial for the treatment of pediatric anxiety disorders (N = 488; 7–17 years of age). Trajectories of interviewer-rated anxiety symptoms were assessed across 12 weeks of treatment at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Consistent with models of temperamental risk for mental health problems, negative affectivity predicted higher anxiety symptoms at intake. A significant diathesis-stress interaction between cumulative risk and coping efficacy emerged, as high risk and perceptions of lower coping efficacy attenuated declines in anxiety across 12 weeks. These patterns did not differ across treatment conditions. The results indicate that for youth experiencing high levels of stress, additional treatment efforts targeting familial stressors and coping efficacy may be important in maximizing treatment outcomes.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by grants (U01MH064089 to Dr. Walkup; U01MH64092 to Dr. Albano; U01MH64003 to Dr. Birmaher; U01MH63747 to Dr. Kendall, U01MH64088 to Dr. Piacentini; U01MH064107 to Dr. Compton; T32MH073517 to Drs. Kiff and Gonzalez) from the National Institute of Mental Health. Sertraline and matching placebo were supplied free of charge by Pfizer. Views expressed within this article represent those of the authors and are not intended to represent the position of National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, or the Department of Health and Human Services. ClinicalTrials.gov Number NCT00052078.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.