1,078
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
TREATMENT

Testing Robustness of Child STEPs Effects with Children and Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
 

Abstract

A critical task in psychotherapy research is identifying the conditions within which treatment benefits can be replicated and outside of which those benefits are reduced. We tested the robustness of beneficial effects found in two previous trials of the modular Child STEPs treatment program for youth anxiety, depression, trauma, and conduct problems. We conducted a randomized trial, with two significant methodological changes from previous trials: (a) shifting from cluster- to person-level randomization, and (b) shifting from individual to more clinically feasible group-based consultation with STEPs therapists. Fifty community clinicians from multiple outpatient clinics were randomly assigned to receive training and consultation in STEPs (n= 25) or to provide usual care (UC; n= 25). There were 156 referred youths—ages 6–16 (M= 10.52, SD = 2.53); 48.1% male; 79.5% Caucasian, 12.8% multiracial, 4.5% Black, 1.9% Latino, 1.3% Other—who were randomized to STEPs (n= 77) or UC (n= 79). Following previous STEPs trials, outcome measures included parent- and youth-reported internalizing, externalizing, total, and idiographic top problems, with repeated measures collected weekly during treatment and longer term over 2 years. Participants in both groups showed statistically significant improvement on all measures, leading to clinically meaningful problem reductions. However, in contrast to previous trials, STEPs was not superior to UC on any measure. As with virtually all treatments, the benefits of STEPs may depend on the conditions—for example, of study design and implementation support—in which it is tested. Identifying those conditions may help guide appropriate use of STEPs, and other treatments, in the future.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the youths, caregivers, and clinicians who participated in this study; to the clinic administrators and state officials whose leadership facilitated and supported the project; and to Shannon Dorsey for her wise guidance.

Disclosure statement

John Weisz is a coauthor of the treatment manual used in this study (i.e., Modular Approach to Therapy for Children with Anxiety, Depression, Trauma, or Conduct Problems) and receives royalties for sales of the manual. The other authors report no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

The study was supported by funding to John R. Weisz from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (Grant 07-90231-000-HCD), Casey Family Programs (Grant 02200), and the Annie E. Casey Foundation (Grant 211.0004).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.