912
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

The VEGFR-2 protein and the VEGFR-2 rs1870377 A>T genetic polymorphism are prognostic factors for gastric cancer

, , , , , & show all
Pages 497-504 | Received 13 Apr 2018, Accepted 15 Oct 2018, Published online: 31 Oct 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: Angiogenesis is one of the key processes in the development of malignant tumors. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) signaling pathway regulates branching angiogenesis in cancer. In this study, we analyzed the associations of VEGF/VEGFR-2 proteins and VEGFR-2 genetic variations with the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC).

Method: We collected the clinical information of patients with GC and extracted genomic DNA from paraffin-embedded tissues. Immunohistochemical methods were used to detect the expression of VEGF and VEGFR-2 in GC tissues. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms of VEGFR-2 were detected by the TaqMan assay. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were applied to analyze the associations between clinicopathological characteristics, VEGFR-2 polymorphisms and GC prognosis.

Results: A total of 256 cases of GC were included in our study. VEGFR-2 (+) and VEGFR-2 (++/+++) protein expression levels were detected in 83 and 135 cases, respectively. High expression of the VEGFR-2 protein was associated with the poor prognosis of GC (log-rank test P = 0.026). No statistical significance was observed for the association between VEGF and the prognosis of GC. The VEGFR-2 rs1870377 A > T genetic polymorphism was discovered to be associated with the prognosis of GC (AA vs. AT, HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.06–2.68, P = 0.027).

Conclusion: Our study suggested that the high expression of VEGFR-2, as well as the VEGFR-2 rs1870377 A > T genetic polymorphism, may be prognostic markers for GC.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Ethical Standards

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Supplemental material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by funding from Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning, China (Grant No. 201540271), Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China (Grant No.15LC05 and No. 13YJ22), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China (Grant No.15ZR1427700).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.