135
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Comparison of Injury Criteria Used in Evaluating Seats for Whiplash Protection

, &
Pages 56-66 | Received 01 Jul 2003, Accepted 01 Sep 2003, Published online: 11 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

A protocol has been proposed for testing seats for whiplash protection, however injury criteria have not yet been chosen. Assuming that whiplash symptoms arise from non-physiological motions of vertebral segments, we determined the ability of proposed criteria to predict peak individual vertebral displacements. Twenty-eight volunteers were subjected to rear impacts while seated in a car seat with head restraint, mounted onto a sled. Accelerometers were used to record head and torso accelerations. The volunteer data was used as a basis for testing post-mortem human specimens (PMHS). The seat was replaced by a platform onto which was mounted each of 11 cervico-thoracic spines. An instrumented headform was mounted to the upper end of the spine. The head restraint, head-to-restraint geometry, sled, and impact pulse remained the same. Head and T1 accelerations were measured and individual vertebral sagittal (XZ) plane rotations and translations were obtained from high speed video. Proposed injury criteria (NIC, Nkm, Nte, Nd) were tested for their ability to predict average, total, and peak intervertebral displacements. PMHS specimens had chest and head X (horizontal) and Z (vertical) linear accelerations similar to volunteers whose heads hit the head restraint. The best predictors were: Nd shear and peak intervertebral posterior translation (r2 = 0.80), Nd extension and peak extension angle (r2 = 0.70), and Nd distraction and peak distraction (r2 = 0.51). Therefore consideration should be given to a displacement based injury criteria such as Nd in assessment of whiplash protection devices.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Supported by a grant from the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Presented at the 18th International Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehickes, Nagoya, Japan, May 2003.

Notes

1Grade 1: end plate (EP) uniform thickness, vertebral body (VB) rounded margins; Grade 2, EP irregular thickness, VB pointed margins; Grade 3, EP focal defects, VB chondrophytes; Grade 4, EP fibrocartilage, VB < 2 mm osteophytes; Grade 5, EP diffuse sclerosis, VB > 2 mm osteophytes.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.