304
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Motor Vehicle and Pedestrian Collisions: Burden of Severe Injury on Major Versus Neighborhood Roads

, , &
Pages 43-47 | Received 23 Jul 2009, Accepted 30 Oct 2009, Published online: 08 Feb 2010
 

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the severity of injuries sustained by pedestrians involved in motor vehicle collisions varies by road type and age.

Methods: All police-reported pedestrian motor vehicle collisions in the city of Toronto, Canada, between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005, were analyzed. Geographic Information Systems software was used to determine whether the collisions occurred on major or neighborhood roads. Age-specific estimates of the burden of pedestrian collisions are presented. Odds ratios and 95 percent confidence intervals were calculated to examine age-specific relationships between injury severity and road type. A second analysis comparing the distribution of severe injury location between age groups was also performed.

Results: The majority of collisions involved adults (68%), although elderly pedestrians were overrepresented in fatal collisions (49%). Severe and fatal collisions involving working-age and elderly adult pedestrians were more likely on major roads. Odds of severe injury occurring on a major road were 1.36 (95% CI: 1.17–1.57) times higher for adults ages 18 to 64, and 1.55 (95% CI: 1.22–1.99) times higher for elderly aged 65+. By contrast, severe injuries among children were more common on neighborhood roads, with odds of severe injury on a major road of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.37–1.1) for children aged 5 to 9. Among children under 9, 64–67 percent of hospitalized or fatal injuries occurred on neighborhood roads, a marked difference from the distribution of such injuries in adults or the elderly, for whom only 29–30 percent of hospitalized or fatal injuries occurred on neighborhood roads (chi-square = 52.6, p ≤.001).

Conclusions: Targeting interventions toward the adult pedestrian burden on major roads alone will not make child pedestrians safer. Pedestrian interventions specific to children and focused on neighborhood roads must be considered in urban centers like Toronto.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the City of Toronto, Traffic Management Centre, for providing data.

Notes

∗significant odds ratios

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.