496
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluation of measures of impairment in real and simulated driving: Results from a randomized, placebo-controlled study

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 245-250 | Received 19 Dec 2014, Accepted 21 Jun 2015, Published online: 12 Feb 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: Standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) is often the primary outcome in experimental studies on impaired driving. However, other measures may be easier and more practical to obtain and reflect a broader range of driving-related behaviors. We wanted to assess the validity and sensitivity of a range of measures in a driving simulator as well as during real driving and compare these to SDLP.

Methods: Twenty healthy male volunteers undertook 6 driving trials each, 3 in a regular car on a closed track resembling rural road conditions and 3 in a simulator with an identical driving scenario. Ethanol was used as impairing substance due to its well-characterized effects on driving. The subjects were tested sober and at blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) of approximately 0.5 and 0.9 g/L. We explored dose–response relationships between BAC and a range of driving-related measures, as well as their BAC-dependent effect sizes.

Results: In simulator driving, ethanol intake increased steering wheel reversal frequency, steering wheel movement measures, average speed, standard deviation of speed, and pedal use frequency. At the test track, only steering wheel movement and standard deviation of speed were significantly correlated to BAC. Likewise, reaction to unexpected incidents and observance of red traffic lights were adversely affected by ethanol in the simulator but not at the test track. Whereas SDLP showed a relatively large effect size that was similar in simulated and real driving, all other measures demonstrated smaller effect sizes, with less pronounced BAC effects on the test track than in the simulator.

Conclusions: The results suggest that the driving-related measures explored in this study are less sensitive to alcohol-mediated driving impairment than SDLP, especially during real (test track) driving. The discrepancy in effect sizes between simulated and real driving may imply low external validity of these measures in simulator studies.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the following employees at SINTEF Technology and Society and the Department of Clinical Pharmacology at St. Olav University Hospital who made valuable contributions to the research project: Dagfinn Moe, Kenneth Sørensen, Terje Giæver, Cato Mausethagen, Nina Husby, Marianne Nordtømme, Odd Hjelkrem, Guro Haltbrekken, Anita Skogholt, Trude Kristine Vaag Gjerde, and Andreas Austgulen Westin. We also thank the study subjects for their participation.

Finally, we express our gratitude to Kristian Sakshaug, who participated in the study but regrettably fell ill and died before its completion.

Additional information

Funding

The research project was funded by a grant from the Research Council of Norway.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.