![Sample our Economics, Finance,Business & Industry journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5931/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Economics-Finance-Business-Industry.jpg"})
Abstract
Objective
This study’s objective was to examine a crash severity characteristic and the relationship as an indicator of abdominal injury causation.
Methods
Data were analyzed from 23 CIREN case vehicles involved in a frontal type collision, had an AIS 2+ abdominal injury, and contained an electronic data recorder (EDR) download. Data was downloaded from the NHTSA and IIHS crash test databases for comparison. Data was run through a MATLAB algorithm calculating the maximum velocity-time profile slope. This data was compared to the available crash tests.
Results
The CIREN vehicle EDR velocity-time slopes ranged from 233 m/s2 to 434 m/s2 for crashes with a delta-v range of 42 km/h to 77 km/h. NHTSA NCAP comparable data was available for all cases, and the slopes ranged from 263 m/s2 to 405 m/s2 calculated from the collected accelerometer. Three comparable tests were available from the IIHS database and the calculated slopes ranged from 252 m/s2 to 298 m/s2. Four test vehicles had EDR data, two each from NHTSA and IIHS and slopes ranged from 245 m/s2 to 281 m/s2. The crash test EDRs slope calculations were lower than the accelerometer data. Nine of the 12 case vehicles had slope values lower than the comparable NCAP accelerometer velocity-time slopes.
Conclusions
Vehicle velocity-time profile can be beneficial to examine the characteristics of crash severity and potential injury. This small sample of field crashes did not indicate a clear relationship of abdominal injury related to crash severity measured by the EDR delta-v slope. EDR results can be considered when determining crash severity, but the limitations need to be understood.