195
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Evaluation of mechanism of injury criteria for field triage of occupants involved in motor vehicle collisions

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages S143-S148 | Received 01 Mar 2022, Accepted 16 Jun 2022, Published online: 25 Jul 2022
 

Abstract

Objective

The mechanism of injury (MOI) criteria assist in determining which patients are at high risk of severe injury and would benefit from direct transport to a trauma center. The goal of this study was to determine whether the prognostic performance of the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) MOI criteria for motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) has changed during the decade since the guidelines were approved. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the performance of these criteria for different age groups and evaluate potential criteria that are not currently in the guidelines.

Methods

Data were obtained from NASS and Crash Investigation Sampling System (CISS) for 2000–2009 and 2010–2019. Cases missing injury severity were excluded, and all other missing data were imputed. The outcome of interest was Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained from 1,000 bootstrapped samples using national case weights. The AUROC for the existing CDC MOI criteria were compared between the 2 decades. The performance of the criteria was also assessed for different age groups based on accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Potential new criteria were then evaluated when added to the current CDC MOI criteria.

Results

There were 150,683 (weighted 73,423,189) cases identified for analysis. There was a small but statistically significant improvement in the AUROC of the MOI criteria in the later decade (2010–2019; AUROC = 0.77, 95% CI [0.76–0.78]) compared to the earlier decade (2000–2009; AUROC = 0.75, 95% CI [0.74–0.76]). The accuracy and specificity did not vary with age, but the sensitivity dropped significantly for older adults (0–18 years: 0.62, 19–54 years: 0.59, ≥55 years: 0.37, and ≥65 years: 0.36). The addition of entrapment improved the sensitivity of the existing criteria and was the only potential new criterion to maintain a sensitivity above 0.95.

Conclusions

The MOI criteria for MVCs in the current CDC guidelines still perform well even as vehicle design has changed. However, the sensitivity of these criteria for older adults is much lower than for younger occupants. The addition of entrapment improved sensitivity while maintaining high specificity and could be considered as a potential modification to current MOI criteria.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

. Performance of existing CDC criteria for all years (2000–2019).a

Data availability

The authors of this article are committed to transparency and reproducibility in research. The data can be obtained from the NHTSA website at https/www.nhtsa.gov. The code files used for this analysis are publicly available at https://github.com/thartka/mvc_moi_triage. This code is made available under GNU General Public License v3.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html.

Additional information

Funding

The work of the primary author was conducted with the support of the iTHRIV Scholars Program. The iTHRIV Scholars Program is supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers UL1TR003015 and KL2TR003016.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.