138
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Geometrically nonlinear transient analysis of Timoshenko tapered beam-column element using a finite element formulation based on the exact shape functions

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 2956-2983 | Received 19 Feb 2023, Accepted 18 Mar 2023, Published online: 08 Apr 2023
 

Abstract

In this paper, a numerical formulation was developed to generate the consistent mass matrix for Timoshenko tapered beam-column element for geometrically nonlinear transient analysis. The basis of the suggested solution is the exact shape functions and their derivatives, which describe the non-uniformity of the element properties. To illustrate the variations in section properties along the tapered element length, the section properties were presented as exponential functions with tapering indices. The model can simulate elements with various solid and hollow cross-sections. The suggested formulation is integrated into a Visual Basic program to perform the analysis, along with numerous examples to verify its precision and effectiveness. As a practical application of the proposed formulation, a structural system was proposed for offshore wind turbines with high elevations, and a geometrical nonlinear dynamic analysis was conducted. The results demonstrated the proposed model’s ability to perform this type of complex calculation with minimal computational effort.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Geotec Office team for their contributions to developing the program used in this study, especially Prof. Dr. Mohamed El Gendy for his crucial efforts in this program.

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Disclosure statement

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Figure 16. Hub lateral displacement for cases from (E-1) to (E-4).

Figure 16. Hub lateral displacement for cases from (E-1) to (E-4).

Figure 17. Base fore-aft bending moment for cases from (E-1) to (E-4).

Figure 17. Base fore-aft bending moment for cases from (E-1) to (E-4).

Figure 18. Comparison between the maximum results of: (a) the hub lateral displacement, (b) the base fore-aft bending moment, (c) the normalized Von Mises stress.

Figure 18. Comparison between the maximum results of: (a) the hub lateral displacement, (b) the base fore-aft bending moment, (c) the normalized Von Mises stress.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.