![Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5947/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Politics-International-Relations.jpg"})
Abstract
After almost two decades of militarisation and military action as well as protests, violence and armed resistance in which civil society, communities and militants played vanguard roles, the Niger Delta entered a new historical period as of October 2009. Based on the Federal Government’s promise to address problems of the Niger Delta as part of a seven-point agenda, militants in the region accepted a federal amnesty, pursuing disarmament and a cessation of hostilities. With the aid of secondary data, this article examines the issue of exclusion in the design and implementation of the Presidential Amnesty Programme and how it has affected peacebuilding in the Niger Delta. This article argues that the commitment put into securing amnesty and militant participation has not translated into the development of a sound programmatic framework based on best practices, the building of a solid inclusionary basis for mobilising and integrating the people, harnessing synergies and efforts, and the construction of a solid platform of intergovernmental and state–non-state partnership. As such, the Presidential Amnesty Programme is likely to only partially address challenges of post-conflict development and peacebuilding in the Niger Delta.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Augustine Ikelegbe
Augustine Ikelegbe is a Professor of Comparative Politics in the Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Benin, Nigeria.
Nathaniel Umukoro
Nathaniel Umukoro (PhD) is a Lecturer in the Department of Political Science, Delta State University, Nigeria. He specialises in strategic, security and development studies.