Abstract
These days, algorithms make a growing number of consequential decisions for and about us, whether it’s the news we get, the kinds of ads we view, or what route we take to work. As libraries move toward adopting algorithms for information retrieval and discovery, it is important that we educate our consumers and ourselves about their pitfalls and promise.
Notes
Notes
1 J. Griffey, “Chapter 1: Introduction,” Library Technology Reports 55, no. 1 (2019): 5–9.
2 N. Chah, “Down the Deep Rabbit Hole: Untangling Deep Learning from Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence,” First Monday 2, no. 24 (2019): 1.
3 T. Finley, “The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence: One Library's Approach,” Information Technology and Libraries 1, no. 38 (2019): 8–13.
4 C. Harper, “Machine Learning and the Library or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love My Robot Overlords,” Code4Lib Journal no. 41 (2018): 6.
5 M. Reidsma, “Algorithmic Bias in Library Discovery Systems,” https://matthew.reidsrow.com/ (accessed September 4, 2019).
6 P. Fernandez, “Through the Looking Glass: Envisioning New Library Technologies,” Library Hi Tech News 3, no. 33 (2016): 20–23; R. Williams, “Artificial Intelligence Assistants in the Library: Siri, Alexa, and Beyond,” Online Searcher 3, no. 43 (2019): 10–14.
7 M. Collins, “Algorithm for the PubMed Best Match Sort Order,” NLM Technical Bulletin, no. 414 (2017): 23–24. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/jf17/jf17_pm_best_match_sort.html (accessed September 9, 2019).
8 N. Fiorini, K. Canese, G. Starchenko, E. Kireev, W. Kim, V. Miller, M. Osipov, M. Kholodov, R. Ismagilov, S. Mohan, et al., “Best Match: New Relevance Search for PubMed,” PLoS Biology 8, no. 16 (2018): e2005343.
9 Fernandez, “Through the Looking Glass,” 5–8.
10 K. L. Wagstaff, and G. Z. Liu, “Automated Classification to Improve the Efficiency of Weeding Library Collections,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2, no. 44 (2018): 238–247.
11 Griffey, “Introduction”, 5–9
12 A. Howard, and J. Borenstein, “The Ugly Truth about Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity,” Science and Engineering Ethics 5, no. 24 (2018): 1521–1536.
13 S. U. Noble, Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. (New York, NY: NYU Press, 2018).
14 R. Tatman, “Gender and Dialect Bias in YouTube Automatic Captions” (Paper presented at the First Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing, Valencia, Spain, April 4, 2017).
15 R. Courtland, “The Bias Detectives,” Nature 558, no. 7710 (2018): 357–360.
16 Noble, "Algorithms of Oppression"
17 R. Caplan, L. Hanson, J. Donovan, and J. Matthews, “Algorithmic Accountability: A Primer,” in Tech Algorithm Briefing: How Algorithms Perpetuate Racial Bias and Inequality (Data and Society, 2018).
18 Reidsma, “Algorithmic Bias”