YOU AREN’T AS CLOSE TO MY FAMILY AS YOU THINK: DISCORDANT PERCEPTIONS ABOUT IN-LAWS AND RISK OF DIVORCE

Abstract

In-law relationships can act as sources of both support and stress for couples. Independent of the nature of the actual relationships with in-laws, it may be that couple similarity in perceptions of these ties determines if they undermine or facilitate marital stability. The current study sought to examine how spousal connections to in-laws and concordance about these relationships early in marriage predicted marital stability in a sample of 355 Black and White married couples followed over 16 years. Husbands and wives reported on time spent with families, whose family they turn to for support, and closeness with families during their first year of marriage. Analyses revealed that discordance on these issues early in marriage was common. We found that even after controlling for husband and wife reports of connections with in-laws, discordance on closeness with the wife’s family predicted divorce. Thus, when conceptualizing the costs and benefits of connections with in-laws, it is important to consider not only the nature of spouses’ ties to each other’s families, but the extent to which their views of these ties are concordant.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The research in this article was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Grant HD40778) to the fifth author, TLO. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the third author, KSB, upon reasonable request.