Abstract
Through this article the authors describe the social service context of the HUSK (The University Research Program to Support Selected Municipal Social Service Offices) projects and briefly describe 10 of the 50 projects funded throughout the country. The welfare state context for the cases and the criteria for case selection are also provided. The 10 cases are organized into three categories that feature the role of dialogue, educational innovation, and service innovation. These cases provide the foundation for the analysis and implications located in the subsequent articles of the special issue.
Notes
1. NAV was about merging three agencies, the Employment Service and the Social Insurance Service (both operated by the national government) and the Municipal Social Services (local government).
2.http://www.google.no/url?sa = t&rct = j&q = &esrc = s&source = web&cd = 1&ved = 0CDAQFjAA&url = http%3A%2F%2Fwww.husk-stavanger.no%2Frogaland%2Fstavanger%2FHuskStavanger.nsf%2FAttachments%2FCDC4C3F8B1E9E3C2C12576150045B8A1%2F%24FILE%2FHusk_katalog_2009.pdf&ei = K9EAUtuiKc7BtAbw34GIBg&usg = AFQjCNGl5txsrfNVANMXEPjKQtzoCVOg0Q&sig2 = 9kxsq2rjalgvnCA0g4b71w&bvm = bv.50310824,d.Yms
3.http://www.nav.no/Om+NAV/For+kommunen/Samarbeid+og+prosjekter/HUSK+%28H%C3%B8gskole-+og+universitetssosialkontor%29+2006+-+2011.322977.cms
4. One of the chapters describes a project in which researchers–teachers, users, and practitioners were involved, Brukermedvirkning med virkning, eller bare som pynt? [User Involvement With Effect, or Just as Garnish], edited by Woll, Slettebo, Bordtkorb, and Ostby. This was a subproject of HUSK Oslo Region, but for balance in the number of projects from the four HUSK regions, this was not included as a case.
5.http://www.nav.no/Om+NAV/For+kommunen/Samarbeid+og+prosjekter/HUSK+%28H%C3%B8gskole-+og+universitetssosialkontor%29+2006+-+2011.322977.cms
8. We got help from the Mill Competence Centre in Baerum, which had previously conducted a dialogue seminar associated with the user evaluation of the project New Chance (Bildsten, Abdisamad, & Hansen, Citation2007).
10. Adapted from Lyso, Samuelsen, and Tronvoll, Citation2012.
12. Anne Grete Jenssen, University of Stavanger.
15. Adapted from multiple HUSK reports, see note 26 below.
19. Adapted from Slettebo, Bridtkorb, Dietrichson, & Lyhne, Citation2009.
20. This is a summary of a note, not published. Nina Skjefstad participated in HUSK Mid-Norway, and was a PhD student at NTNU-Trondheim, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Social Work and Health Science.
23. Op. cit. p 10. Authors translation.
24. HUSK, Publications 2006–2011, p. 45: Brukermedvirkning. Likeverd og anerkjennelse, [User Involvement. Equality and Recognition], (Jenssen & Tronvoll, Eds.); Samarbeidsforskning i praksis [Collaborative Research in Practice (Johannessen, Natland, & Stokken, Eds.; Minoritetsperspektivet i sosialt arbeid [Minoriy Perspective in Social Work], (Berg & Ask, Eds.); Kritisk refleksjon [Critical Reflection], (Askeland, Ed.).
26. Only the publications from the various HUSK project reports provide the basis for description and translation into English in this article.
Bjerke, E. (2011). Jeg har alltid oppfattet meg selv som … [“I have always considered myself as…]”. In T.Slettebo, E.Brodtkorb, & H.Dalen (Eds.), Bruker. Brukermedvirkning. Bruker med virkning. Tverrfaglig samarbeid. Partnerskap. En brukermedvirkningsprosess i HUSK. [User. User involvement. User with effect. Cross-disciplinary cooperation. Partnership. A user involvement process in HUSK][Booklet] (pp. 36–41). Skien, Norway: KREM. Retrieved from http://www.krem-norge.no/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/HUSK_brukermedvirkning_52s.pdf. Bjerke, E. (2011). Jeg har alltid oppfattet meg selv som … [“I have always considered myself as…]”. In T.Slettebo, E.Brodtkorb, & H.Dalen (Eds.), Bruker. Brukermedvirkning. Bruker med virkning. Tverrfaglig samarbeid. Partnerskap. En brukermedvirkningsprosess i HUSK. [User. User involvement. User with effect. Cross-disciplinary cooperation. Partnership. A user involvement process in HUSK][Booklet] (pp. 36–41). Skien, Norway: KREM. Retrieved from http://www.krem-norge.no/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/HUSK_brukermedvirkning_52s.pdf. Bildsten, C., Abdisamad, A. S., & Hansen, C. (2007). Moellamodellen—medvirkningsbaserte metoder med fokus på lokale ressurser. [The Mill model—Participatory based methods with focus on local resources]. In Somaliere i Norge, noen erfaringer. [Somalis in Norway, some experiences]. Oslo, Norway: The Directorate of Integration and Diversity (IMDi). Dietrichson, V., & Ronbeck, L. H. (2012). Når brukere blir prosjektledere – erfaringsrapport fra et HUSK-prosjekt. [When users become project managers—Experiences from a HUSK project] [Booklet]. Skien, Norway: KREM. Lyso, K., Samuelsen, R. M., & Tronvoll, I. M. (2012). Dialoggruppa—hvordan et brukerstyrt HUK-prosjekt utviklet seg. [The dialog group—How a user-controlled HUSK project developed]. In A. G.Jenssen & I. M.Tronvoll (Eds.), Brukermedvirkning. Likeverd og anerkjennelse. [User involvement. Equality and recognition] (pp. 85–97). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press. Bruns, A. K. (2012). Moeteplassen, et sted å moetes. [The Meeting Place, a place to meet.]. In A. G.Jenssen & I. M.Tronvoll (Eds.), Brukermedvirkning. Likeverd og anerkjennelse. [User involvement. Equality and recognition] (pp. 76–84). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press. Fehn, I. L. S. (in press). “Fagligheten sitter i veggene på Sagene”. Fra studentenes evalueringer av praksis på NAV Sagene. [“The professionalism is in the walls.” The students evaluation of having practice internship at NAV Sagene]. In M.Ranger, K.Rytter, & H.Dalen (Eds.), HUSK Sagene Høgskoleklinikk i sosialt arbeid. “Teoretisk kunnskap viser seg annerledes i praksis enn i boeker.” [The University Clinic in Social Work in the NAV Sagene District Office in Oslo, Norway. “Theoretical knowledge is different in practice than in books.”]. Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt forlag. Johansson, G. (in press). Om praksisstudiet sett fra utdanningens side. [About the practice internship, seen from the educational staff]. In M.Ranger, K.Rytter, & H.Dalen (Eds.), HUSK Sagene Høgskoleklinikk i sosialt arbeid. “Teoretisk kunnskap viser seg annerledes i praksis enn i bøker.” [The University Clinic in Social Work in the NAV Sagene District Office in Oslo, Norway. “Theoretical knowledge is different in practice than in books.”]. Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt forlag. Rytter, K., Ranger, M., & Dalen, H. (in press). NAV Sagene, HiOA og KREM. Felles arena for kunnskapsutvikling, brukermedvirkning og undervisning. [NAV Sagene, OAUC and KREM. A joint arena for development of knowledge, user involvement and teaching.]. In M.Ranger, K.Rytter, & H.Dalen (Eds.), HUSK Sagene Høgskoleklinikk i sosialt arbeid. “Teoretisk kunnskap viser seg annerledes i praksis enn i bøker.” [The University Clinic in Social Work in the NAV Sagene District Office in Oslo, Norway. “Theoretical knowledge is different in practice than in Books.”]. Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt forlag. Torstensen, T. B., & Dalen, H. (in press). Sosial oppfølgning slik brukerne på NAV Sagene vil ha det. [Follow up social work at NAV Sagene as the users want it]. In M.Ranger, K.Rytter, & H.Dalen (Eds.), HUSK Sagene Høgskoleklinikk i sosialt arbeid. “Teoretisk kunnskap viser seg annerledes i praksis enn i bøker.” [The University Clinic in Social Work in the NAV Sagene District Office in Oslo, Norway. “Theoretical knowledge is different in practice than in books.”]. Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt forlag. Vennesland, H., & Nordhagen, K. (in press). NAV Sagene som praksissenter. [NAV Sagene as a center of practice]. In M.Ranger, K.Rytter, & H.Dalen (Eds.), HUSK Sagene Høgskoleklinikk i sosialt arbeid. “Teoretisk kunnskap viser seg annerledes i praksis enn i bøker.” [The University Clinic in Social Work in the NAV Sagene District Office in Oslo, Norway. “Theoretical knowledge is different in practice than in books”]. Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt forlag. Kvammen, M. F. (2011, September). Field practice education at University of Agder, Norway. Paper presented at the Conference: Field Practice Education. Association of South African Social Work Education Institutions (ASAWEI), Gauteng South Africa, September 7 to 11, 2011. Kvammen, M. F. (2012, September). Møte mellom erfaringsveiledere og sosionomstudenter i praksis. [Meetings between mentors with user experiences and students of social work. Paper presented at the conference]. Nordisk nætverk for professionsforskning (NORPRO) [Nordic forum for studies on professions]. Aarhus September 25 to 26, 2012. Aasmundsen, H., & Sagvaag, H. (2012). “Som å snakke til en vegg.” Personer med rusproblemer og deres erfaringer med brukermedvirkning [“It's like talking to a wall.” People with drug abuse and their experiences with user involvement]. In A. G.Jenssen & I. M.Tronvoll (Eds.), Brukermedvirkning. Likeverd og anerkjennelse [User involvement. Equality and recognition] (pp. 188–200). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press. Dahlberg, I. E., & Lichtwark, W. (2011). “Hvordan kan jeg ha planer om fremtiden, når jeg ikke klarer dagen”. [“How can I have plans for the future, when I'm not able to cope with the day to day?”]. In A.Johannessen, S.Natland, & A. M.Støkken (Eds.), Samarbeidsforskning i praksis. [Collaborative research in practice] (pp. 127–139). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press. Eide, S. B. (2011). Metode for kunnskaps- og tjenesteutvikling ved samrefleksjon. [Method for knowledge- and services development]. In A.Johannessen, S.Natland, & A. M.Støkken (Eds.), Samarbeidsforskning i praksis. [Collaborative research in practice] (pp. 184–194). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press. Vist, G., & Aasen, K. (2011). “Fagtekst”—et prosjekt om dokumentasjon og faglig arbeid. [“The Professional Text”—A project about documentation of professional work]. In A.Johannessen, S.Natland, & A. M.Støkken (Eds.), Samarbeidsforskning i praksis. [Collaborative research in practice] (pp. 156–170). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press. Dyhr-Nielsen, R., & Sagatun, S. (2010). Bruk av begreper om praksis I NAV/sosialtjenesten. [Use of concepts about practice in NAV/Social services (Paper, 151)]. Kristiansand, Norway: University of Agder.